The American Medical Association (AMA) has announced that, after assessing the proposed $69 billion merger between pharmacy benefit manager CVS Health and insurer Aetna, the organization is calling for regulators to block the transaction.
The American Medical Association (AMA) has announced that, after assessing the proposed $69 billion merger between pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) CVS Health and insurer Aetna, the organization is calling for regulators to block the transaction. The AMA has conducted an analysis of the merger since December 2017 and has sought the opinions and input of academic experts in health economics, health policy, and antitrust laws.
The president of the AMA, Barbara L. McAneny, MD, outlined the AMA’s reasoning behind the organization’s position in a hearing held by the California Department of Insurance. The position is based on evidence the AMA has found that the merger would have anticompetitive effects on Medicare Part D, PBM services, health insurance, retail pharmacy, and specialty pharmacy.
“After very careful consideration over the past months, the AMA has come to the conclusion that this merger would likely substantially lessen competition in many healthcare markets, to the detriment of patients,” said McAneny during her testimony. “The AMA is now convinced that the proposed CVS-Aetna merger should be blocked.”
The AMA will file a post-hearing memorandum compiling all of its concerns and the potential negative consequences of the merger; including an increase in premiums because of the consolidation in 30 Medicare Part D regional markets, an increase in drug spending and out-of-pocket costs for patients, a decrease in competition in health insurance markets, and the logistical difficulties of the merger.
In a statement to Forbes made yesterday, CVS said, “This combination does not further concentrate the healthcare sector; instead it reconfigures it to bring together disparate parts of the healthcare system that today lead to inefficient, ineffective, and more costly care.”
AMA, the nation’s largest physician association, looks to further address its concerns with federal and state regulators.
“Thanks to [California] Insurance Commissioner [David] Jones’ decision to hold this hearing, federal and state antitrust officials now have powerful reasons to block this harmful merger and foster a more competitive marketplace that will operate in patients’ best interest,” said the organization in a statement.
The AMA is not the first body to raise concerns about the deal, as the American Antitrust Institute (AAI) urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) to block the merger in March 2018, citing its belief that 3 integrated PBM-insurer systems would dominate the marketplace and effectively lock out competition.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.