Last week, at the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation's 13th annual congress in Vienna, Austria, researchers presented data from the NOR-SWITCH EXTENSION trial—a 26-week open label extension of the NOR-SWITCH trial—concerning the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subgroup.
The NOR-SWITCH trial—a 52-week, double-blind, noninferiority trial that has become the basis on which the case for switching patients to biosimilars has been made—demonstrated that switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) was noninferior to continued treatment with the reference product in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity.
However, the study was not powered to demonstrate noninferiority of the biosimilar in the individual disease states, including Crohn disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis. In recent months, those who are skeptical about switching patients to biosimilars have highlighted this fact, and some clinicians have asked whether the extrapolation of indications is reasonable.
Last week, at the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation’s 13th annual congress in Vienna, Austria, researchers presented data from the NOR-SWITCH EXTENSION trial—a 26-week open label extension trial—concerning the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subgroup.
The extension assessed the safety of uninterrupted treatment with biosimilar inflixmab through week 78 compared with switching from the reference product to the biosimilar at week 52. The primary endpoint of the extension was overall disease worsening during follow-up.
In total, 380 of 438 patients who completed the main trial entered the extension, and overall disease worsening occurred in 16.8% in the CT-P13 maintenance group and 11.6% in the switch group. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the adjusted difference was within the pre-specified 15% noninferiority margin. The incidence of adverse events, presence of anti-drug antibodies, and patient-reported outcome measures were also comparable between the 2 groups.
Disease worsening occurred in 20.6% and 12.1% of the maintenance group and the switch group, respectively, among patients with CD, and 15.4% and 2.9% in the maintenance group and the switch group, respectively, among patients with UC. The researchers report that these findings were also within the pre-specified noninferiority margin.
Changes from baseline to the study’s end in both CD and UC showed similarity between the maintenance and switch arms with respect to the Harvey Bradshaw Index, Partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin.
The authors concluded that the open-label extension did not show any difference between patients who remained on CT-P13 versus those who switched from the reference product to the biosimilar, and that the exploratory subgroup analyses of patients with CD and UC showed similarity between the groups in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity.
Reference
Jørgensen KK, Goll GL, Sexton J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) after switching from originator infliximab: explorative subgroup analyses in IBD from the NOR-SWITCH EXTENSION trial. Presented at the 13th Congress of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation, February 14 to 17, 2018; Vienna, Austria. Abstract P483. https://www.ecco-ibd.eu/publications/congress-abstract-s/abstracts-2018/item/p483-long-term-efficacy-and-safety-of-biosimilar-infliximab-ct-p13-after-switching-from-originator-infliximab-explorative-subgroup-analyses-in-ibd-from-the-nor-switch-extension-trial.html
AMCP Posters Tackle Interchangeability and Medicaid, Factors Driving Biosimilar Access
April 24th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) annual meeting explore how an interchangeable insulin glargine biosimilar plays into Medicaid budgets and the top factors driving access to biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for January 2024—Podcast Edition
February 4th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we reminisce on all the major gastroenterology news from January, which brought several reports quantifying how the gastroenterology biosimilar market is progressing and marked the 1-year anniversary of adalimumab biosimilar competition in the US.
What Clinicians Need to Know About Using Biosimilars to Treat IBD
April 13th 2024A review article, intended to act as a guide for clinicians, summarizes the available infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as others that are coming down the pipeline.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.