Currently, beyond the evaluation of a patient’s 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28), there are no standard methods to determine whether patients will respond well to dose reduction of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy.
Dose tapering or discontinuation of anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been shown to be safe and effective in certain patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, beyond the evaluation of a patient’s 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28), there are no standard methods to determine whether patients will respond well to dose reduction.
Researchers have identified mental health as a possible marker for disease flare due to the connection between poor mental health and its possible influence on symptom reporting and interference with self-management behavior. In addition, poor mental health has been associated with increased pain and fatigue, as well as higher disease activity in patients with RA.
A study newly published in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases sought to evaluate whether fatigue, baseline mental health (assessed via depression, anxiety, or low mood), and functional states (as measured by self-reported questionnaires) can indicate the risk of flares in patients who are tapering therapy.
Researchers analyzed results from the Optimizing TNF Tapering in RA (OPTTIRA) trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study that investigated anti-TNF tapering in patients with RA who were in sustained low disease activity (LDA).
The study comprised 2 phases: the randomized, controlled, open-label, proof-of-principle phase (from month 0 to month 6), followed by the open, exploratory phase (month 6 to month 12) for patients who completed the initial trial period.
Between 2011 and 2013, 244 patients were screened, 103 were randomized, and 97 accepted their allocated treatment. The majority of patients participating in the study were receiving methotrexate in combination with their anti-TNF therapy (n = 67, 69%) and the median disease duration was 11 years (interquartile range, 7-17), with 73 patients (75%) fulfilling DAS28 remission criteria (a DAS28 score of less than 2.6).
In the first phase of the study, 3 patients who tapered anti-TNF therapy by 33% (experimental group 1) and 6 patients who tapered anti-TNF therapy by 66% (experimental group 2) flared, versus 8 patients in the control arm.
In the second phase, flares were observed in 9 patients in experimental group 1 and 4 patients in experimental group 2 who continued to taper therapy until complete termination of treatment. Of the control group, 3 patients who tapered anti-TNF treatment by 33% and 8 patients who tapered anti-TNF agents by 66% flared.
Overall, a higher DAS28 score at the start of the study was associated with an increased risk of flare. The association remained significant even after adjusting for co-variates (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.18-3.24; P =.04).
A fatigue and a short-form mental health survey (SF-36) also predicted flare in univariate models, but when analyses were adjusted, only mental health continued to be a statistically significant predictor of flare (adjusted HR per 10 units, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93; P =.01).
The researchers concluded that baseline depression as measured by SF-36 mental health scale, as well as DAS28, can independently predict flare events in patients with sustained LDA who taper anti-TNF therapy. Based on the findings of the analysis, researchers have recommended that an assessment of mental health and functional status should be considered prior to beginning dose reduction in patients with RA.
Reference
Bechman K, Sin EF, Ibrahim F, et al. Mental health, fatigue and function are associated with increased risk of disease flare following TNF inhibitor tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory analysis of data from the Optimizing TNF Tapering in RA (OPTTIRA) trial. RMD Open. 2018; 4(1):e000676. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000676.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
Biosimilars Rheumatology Roundup for February 2024—Podcast Edition
March 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® revisited all the major rheumatology biosimilar news from February 2024, including the FDA approval of the 10th adalimumab biosimilar, the promise for an oral delivery system for ustekinumab, and the impact of adalimumab products on COVID-19 antibodies.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.