Last week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released a report describing its contributions to science, medicines, and health for the year 2017.
Last week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released a report describing its contributions to science, medicines, and health for the year 2017.
Last year, the EMA recommended a total of 92 medicines for marketing authorization and of these approvals, 35 contained a new active substance.
The number of applications for biosimilar medicines continues to grow year over year, with 17 applications received by the EMA in 2017, compared with 14 in 2016. The EMA also reported that this is the highest number of applications it has received to date in a single year. To date, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use has given positive opinions for 28 biosimilars in the European Union.
Furthermore, the EMA and the European Commission (EC) released an information guide for healthcare professionals on biosimilar medicines in May 2017. The objective of the guide was to provide healthcare professionals with information on both the science and the regulation of biosimilar drugs.
“Promoting innovation and research in medicine development so that patients can benefit from much-needed safe, high-quality and effective medicines is a key priority for the Agency,” said the EMA in its report.
In the United States, the FDA more than doubled the number of drugs it approved in 2017, with 46 novel medicines receiving the green light compared with the year prior. However, it is important to note that the US drug approval tally for 2017 does not include the first of a new wave of cell and gene therapies from companies Novartis, Gilead Sciences, and Spark Therapeutics, which all had drug approvals in 2017 under a separate category.
Over the entire span of the biosimilar approval pathway’s use in the United States, the FDA has approved only 9 biosimilar therapies, with no approvals to date in 2018. In fact, the FDA has issued 4 Complete Response Letters (CRLs) in 2018: Celltrion received CRLs for both its proposed rituximab and trastuzumab biosimilars; Sandoz for its proposed rituximab biosimilar; and Pfizer for its proposed trastuzumab biosimilar.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.