This week, Scott Gottlieb, MD, Commissioner of the FDA, addressed the US House Subcommittee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies, and made his case for increased funding for the FDA.
This week, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, addressed the US House Subcommittee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies, and made his case for increased funding for the FDA.
The President’s budget request for 2019 proposes $5.8 billion in total resources for the FDA—an increase of $633 million—which is 13% more than the provided in the 2018 Annualized Continuing Resolution.
Gottlieb said that, using these funds, the FDA would undertake a number of initiatives, including a program to modernize the review of generic drug applications as a way to increase competition, address high drug costs, and advance new approaches to support development of treatments for rare diseases.
One particular initiative got a special mention from Gottlieb: building a knowledge management platform for drug and medical device review programs to help make the review program more efficient, rigorous, transparent, and consistent.
The platform, he said, would “enable us to store and manage the collected experience of our medical review staff—to have a way to identify how decisions are made across different functions, the scientific precedents we establish in the course of our review process, and the knowledge we develop.” Currently, FDA staff have limited options to query review decisions or extract information about how those decisions were made. “We can’t store and interrogate the scientific precedent we establish every day.”
Increased funding would also help the agency to develop new guidance documents for developing drugs to treat ulcerative colitis, pediatric cancers, pediatric HIV, and non-cancer blood disorders. Disease-specific guidance documents—of which the agency hopes to issue “hundreds”—Gottlieb said, should help drug developers to better navigate the path to drug approval.
The President’s budget, released in February 2018, includes other provisions of interest for healthcare stakeholders; the White House called for the creation of a National Institute for Research on Safety and Quality (replacing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality under HHS); the transfer of the National Institute of Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research from HHS to the NIH; and the transfer of the National Institute of Occupational Safety from the NIH to the Centers for Disease Control. The plan would also provide the NIH with an additional $750 million for research on the opioid crisis ($400 million of which would be spent on public-private partnerships).
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.