Antibodies that deplete B cells, including rituximab, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurological conditions such as progressive multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The efficacy of these treatments hinges on adequate B-cell depletion, but there is a lack of standardization in treatment and monitoring protocols to guide clinical practice.
Antibodies that deplete B cells, including rituximab, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurological conditions such as progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The efficacy of these treatments hinges on adequate B-cell depletion, but there is a lack of standardization in treatment and monitoring protocols to guide clinical practice.
In order to identify factors that impact repopulation of B cells after depletion therapy in patients with neurological diseases, researchers, reporting their findings in Neurology, Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, analyzed CD19+ B-cell counts in neurology patients who had been treated at least 1 time with a B-cell depleting therapy.
The researchers identified patients in the neurology department of a single center in Germany between 2007 and 2017 and used their anonymized data to determine CD19+ cell counts obtained by flow cytometry.
In total, 45 patients, with a total of 373 observations, were identified. The majority of patients received treatment for MS or NMOSD, although patients with polyneuropathy, myasthenia, cerebral vasculitis, and other diseases were also included. Forty-two patients received rituximab, and another 3 received ocrelizumab as part of a clinical trial program. Most (71.1%) patients received doses adapted to body surface area (375 mg/m2), while the remaining patients received fixed doses.
The researchers found that 37 patients experienced at least 1 event of CD19+ repopulation (CD19+ cells rising to a level above 1% of total CD45+ lymphocytes after depletion). The earliest repopulation occurred after 108 days, and the latest occurred after 554 days. Patients who had higher body surface area (and dosages ranging from 574 mg to 975 mg) had a higher risk of experiencing repopulation than patients with lower body surface area, even when they received an adapted dose (hazard ratio, 1.015 per cm2; P <.05); with every 10-cm2 increase, the time to cell repopulation was reduced by 14 days.
Several patients received more than 1 treatment cycle of rituximab, and 18 patients had sufficient data to compare B-cell repopulation over time in the same patient; the researchers found no clear pattern in B-cell recovery after the first and last treatment.
“It is important to not miss the time point of B-cell repopulation, as this is most likely linked to resurging disease activity, at least in patients with MS and [NMOSD],” write the authors, who note that “monitoring of B cells is recommended with special attendance to [high—body surface area] patients to not miss the early repopulators.” The researchers propose that patients receiving treatment for neurologic diseases be monitored after 2 and 4 months, then biweekly to every 4 weeks thereafter.
Additionally, the researchers say, future investigations of B-cell depleting therapies in neurological diseases should address both dosing protocol and biomarkers beyond CD19+ cells in the peripheral blood; potential biomarkers that could prove useful include memory and effector B cells.
Reference
Ellwardt E, Ellwardt L, Bittner S, Zipp F. Monitoring B-cell repopulation after depletion therapy in neurologic patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(4):e463. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000463.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
Cardinal Health Report Showcases Biosimilar Growth, Provider and Payer Evolution, and More
February 29th 2024In its annual biosimilars report, Cardinal Health provided updates on how provider acceptance growth, evolving payer dynamics, and the growing pipeline for biosimilars will shape the biosimilar landscape over the next 5 years.
Biosimilar Substitution Within OCM Could Result in Lower Total Cost of Care
February 16th 2024Researchers found that the total cost of care per oncology episode was significantly lowered when biosimilar substitution was implemented in Medicare’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), suggesting that biosimilar uptake can serve as a critical tool to mitigate risk and improve financial performance for providers.