A new study used flow cytometry to compare phosphorylation levels of intracellular epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with psoriasis in clinical remission who were treated with reference infliximab versus healthy controls, and further evaluated whether a switch from reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 affected intracellular phosphorylation patterns.
Biologic treatments, including anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, can significantly improve psoriasis, but come at a high cost. While biosimilar therapies help to control the cost of biologic treatment, differences in manufacturing of innovator biologics and biosimilars have raised concerns about the potential to impact biological activity, efficacy, and tolerability.
A new study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology, used flow cytometry to compare phosphorylation levels of intracellular epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with psoriasis in clinical remission (n = 25) who were treated with reference infliximab versus healthy controls (n = 19), and further evaluated whether a switch from reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 affected intracellular phosphorylation patterns.
The researchers, led by Anders Krough Aarebrot, measured phosphorylation in PBMC before and after TNF stimulation in cells collected at inclusion, 3 months, and 12 months. Twenty-two patients were then randomized to either continue treatment with reference infliximab or switch to CT-P13.
The researchers found that:
The authors concluded that although there were significant differences in intracellular phosphorylation of PBMC between patients with psoriasis and healthy controls, a switch to biosimilar infliximab did not result in any significant differences, a finding that suggests that CT-P13 is noninferior to its reference.
The researchers note that this is the first study to use flow cytometry in PBMC comparing patients with psoriasis with healthy controls, or to monitor patients switching from biologics to biosimilars; they suggest that using flow cytometry might represent a promising tool to monitor disease activity and treatment efficacy in patients with psoriasis in the future.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.