A new study, published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, sought to test antigenic comparability between the reference infliximab and the biosimilar.
All monoclonal antibodies have the potential to evoke anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in patients, and these products can have multiple quality attributes that can impact the immunogenicity, and therefore efficacy, of the drug product. While treatment with reference infliximab (Remicade) and its biosimilar, CT-P13 (Inflectra, Remsima), resulted in similar rates of ADAs in patients who received the drugs in 2 pivotal clinical trials, only limited data are available related to cross‐immunogenicity of reference infliximab and CT‐P13.
A new study, published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, sought to test antigenic comparability between the reference infliximab and the biosimilar. The researchers included the sera of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were treated with the biosimilar or the reference infliximab; they assessed 42 ADA-positive sera samples from patients with IBD who had been treated with the biosimilar for 9 months or more to determine whether the ADAs to CT-P13 would cross-react with 5 different batches of reference infliximab.
They found that all 42 ADA-positive samples of sera reacted to CT-P13 and also reacted to all 5 batches of the reference, and similar antibody cross-reactivity was present in sera from patients who had previous infliximab exposure and in those who were naïve to anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy.
Additionally, the researchers measured immunoglobulin G4 activity (IgG4) against 5 batches of the biosimilar and 5 batches of the reference drug. The results showed a similar response of IgG4 against all batches of both products.
“Our findings indicate that sera from IBD patients who developed anti‐CT‐P13 antibodies are cross‐reactive with infliximab,” conclude the authors, adding that, “Interestingly, we observed no difference in the concentration of IgG4 [ADAs] whether the patients were anti‐TNF naïve or infliximab‐experienced patients. Therefore, no specific long‐term immunity was developed to infliximab and exacerbated to CT‐P13 after the switch.”
They add that switching between these products is unlikely to elicit different ADAs, and say that “These data point toward a safe switching between the [2] drugs in ADA‐negative patients.”
Reference
Goncalves J, Santos M, Acurcio R, et al. Antigenic response to CT-P13 and infliximab originator in inflammatory bowel disease patients shows similar epitope recognition. [Published online June 5, 2018.] Aliment Pharmacol Ther. doi: 10.1111/apt.14808.
Eye on Pharma: Keytruda Biosimilar Deal; German Court Bans Imraldi; New Biosimilars for Japan
June 17th 2025Alvotech and Dr. Reddy's partner to develop a Keytruda biosimilar, a German court bans Humira biosimilar over patent dispute, and Samsung Bioepis enters a strategic agreement with NIPRO Corporation in Japan.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.