On Sunday, during the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)’s 2019 meeting, being held in Atlanta, Georgia, researchers reported on the safety and efficacy of the proposed infliximab biosimilar ABP 710 in a phase 3 study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Researchers also reported on a phase 1 and 3 study of the proposed rituximab biosimilar, ABP 798, in patients with RA.
In December 2018, biosimilar developer Amgen announced that it had submitted its proposed infliximab biosimilar, ABP 710, referencing Remicade, to the FDA for review. A regulatory decision is expected soon, and on Sunday, during the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)’s 2019 meeting, being held in Atlanta, Georgia, researchers reported on the safety and efficacy of the proposed infliximab biosimilar in a phase 3 study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
ABP 710
In the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multiple-dose study, the biosimilar was compared with the reference infliximab.1 In total, 556 patients were treated with the biosimilar (n = 278) or the reference (n = 278) at a dose of 3 mg/kg on day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, then every 8 weeks until week 22. The primary end point of the study was response difference in terms of the ACR criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) at week 22.
Patients who completed the 22 weeks who were initially given the reference drug were randomized to continue treatment with the reference (n = 121) or switch to the biosimilar (n = 119) and receive treatment until week 46; patients randomized to the biosimilar continued their therapy (n = 244) until week 46.
The response difference in terms of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37 (90% CI, 2.67-15.96), and, write the authors, results of the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across groups were similar, with overlapping 95% CIs of ACR response rates between groups at all and with narrow response differences at all time points.
An additional analysis presented by the same research team showed that, the ACR components that had the largest response difference between treatment groups were Subject’s Assessment of Disease-related Pain (—30.8; standard deviation [SD], 28.75) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (–0.53; SD, 0.59) scores.2 The difference in mean change from baseline and the associated 90% and 95% CIs were below the thresholds of minimal clinically important improvement, however, and so were not deemed clinically meaningful.
ABP 798
On Sunday, researchers also reported on a phase 1 and 3 study of the proposed rituximab biosimilar, ABP 798, in patients with RA.3 Positive topline results from the study were first announced in January of this year, and the data presented on Sunday from the randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study give a further look at the safety and efficacy of this proposed therapy in the setting of RA.
The study, which had a primary efficacy end point of change in baseline at week 24 in disease activity score in a count of 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), included 311 patients with RA who had not achieved an adequate response to disease-modifying therapies. Patients were randomized to receive 2 intravenous infusions of 1000 mg of the biosimilar (n = 104), the EU-licensed reference (n = 104), or the US-licensed reference (n = 103) 2 weeks apart. At week 24, those receiving the biosimilar or the EU reference received another dose of their therapy, while those on the US reference switched to the biosimilar.
In terms of change from baseline in terms of DAS28-CRP, the 90% CI (—0.225 to 0.264) and 95% CI (–0.273 to 0.312) fell within the prespecified equivalence margin of –0.6 to 0.6, thereby demonstrating clinical equivalence between the biosimilar and the reference products. The 90% and 95% CIs for the mean differences between the biosimilar and the EU and US arms taken individually were also within the prespecified margin.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 50% of the biosimilar arm, 42.3% of the EU reference arm, and 42.7% of the US reference arm. Infusion-related reactions were the most common AEs of interest. Binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies, respectively developed in 13.4% and 8.2% of the biosimilar arm, 10.6% and 2.1% of the EU reference arm, and 10.6% and 8.2% of the US reference arm.
Based on these results, say the authors, the clinical equivalence of the biosimilar to the EU and US references has been established.
References
1. Genovese M, Sanchez-Burson J, Balázs É, Everding A, Oh MS, Fanjiang G, Cohen S. Efficacy and safety results from a phase 3 study of biosimilar candidate ABP 710 in subjects with moderate to severe RA. Presented at: The American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting, November 8-13, 2019; Atlanta, Georgia. Abstract 520.
2. Genovese M, Sanchez-Burson J, Balázs É, Everding A, Oh MS, Fanjiang G, Cohen S. Efficacy of biosimilar candidate ABP 710 in a phase 3 study in subjects with moderate to severe RA: additional analysis focusing on the ACR individual components. Presented at: The American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting, November 8-13, 2019; Atlanta, Georgia. Abstract 519.
3. Burmester G, Drescher E, Hrycaj P, Chien D, Pan Z, Cohen S. Efficacy and safety results from a randomized double-blind study that compared the proposed biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab in subject with moderate to severe RA. Presented at: The American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting, November 8-13, 2019; Atlanta, Georgia. Abstract 537.
Partnering for Biosimilar Security: India's Role in US Health Care Savings, Supply Chain Stability
May 9th 2024As Indian pharmaceutical companies supplied 4 of every 10 prescriptions in the US in 2022, generating $1.3 trillion in health care savings, a new IQVIA report highlights concerns about supply chain risks and advocates for partnerships to bolster biosimilar security and overall supply chain resilience.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.
Biosimilars Rheumatology Roundup for February 2024—Podcast Edition
March 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® revisited all the major rheumatology biosimilar news from February 2024, including the FDA approval of the 10th adalimumab biosimilar, the promise for an oral delivery system for ustekinumab, and the impact of adalimumab products on COVID-19 antibodies.
Dr Sophia Humphreys Provides Calls to Action to Ensure Biosimilar Market Sustainability
April 30th 2024During her presentation during Festival of Biologics USA, Sophia Humphreys, PharmD, director of formulary management at Sutter Health, gave an overview of current challenges and opportunities for the biosimilar market and offered calls to action for multiple stakeholders.
Eye on Pharma: EU Ustekinumab Approval; New Golimumab Data; Evernorth Adds Humira Biosimilar
April 29th 2024The European Union gained a new ustekinumab biosimilar; Alvotech released positive results from a clinical trial evaluating a golimumab biosimilar and the reference products (Simponi and Simponi Aria), and Evernorth announced that it is set to cover an adalimumab biosimilar at zero cost to patients.