In 2018, The Generic Biosimilar Medicines Association (GBMA) was awarded the Biosimilar Education Grant by the Australian government to develop an educational program for Australian stakeholders with the aim of increasing confidence in biosimilars that are listed on the nation’s public drug benefit plan. Now, the GBMA has launched an educational hub.
The Generic Biosimilar Medicines Association (GBMA), which represents generic and biosimilar drug developers in Australia, has launched an educational portal aimed providing information on biosimilars to prescribers, pharmacists, and patients.
In 2018, GBMA was awarded the Biosimilar Education Grant by the Australian government to develop an educational program for Australian stakeholders with the aim of increasing confidence in biosimilars that are listed on the nation’s public drug benefit plan, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).
The prescriber section of the educational portal includes a comprehensive brochure that explains the development process for biosimilars; pharmacovigilance for these products; and "a-flagging" of medicines, which is a determination of therapeutic equivalence that allows a biosimilar to be substituted at the pharmacy level for its reference following patient consultation. It also provides samples of letters that can be sent to patients to notify them that they may be switched to a biosimilar.
The pharmacist section describes how a-flagged biosimilars may be substituted at the point of dispensing, and explains that pharmacists should discuss brand substitution with prescribers to maintain and improve professional relationships and avoid any misunderstandings.
Pharmacists should also educate their patients, said GBMA, saying that patients may be encouraged to keep or photograph their drug’s packaging to enable them to keep track of brand and batch numbers for their future healthcare interactions.
Patient and caregiver information provided in the portal includes details about about the kinds of diseases that biosimilars are approved to treat, and explains the difference between biosimilars and generics. It provides an outline of the regulatory process for biosimilars, and contains a question-and-answer section that discusses safety, efficacy, and quality of these therapies.
Among the key communications of the portal is the fact that Australia’s statutory price reduction of 25% applies to all brands of a medicine after the first generic or biosimilar product is listed on the PBS. Savings generated through the use of biosimilars, driven in part by this mandatory discount, can be reinvested into other aspects of the healthcare system, explains GBMA, leading to expanded access, funding for new treatments, and a larger range of subsidized therapies available through the PBS’ national system.
The portal also includes quarterly literature reviews that contain abstracts of studies related to biosimilars, specifically in reference to substitution and the extrapolation of indications. Other studies covered include those related to health outcomes, current perceptions, and uptake initiatives. A repository of videos with thought leaders in various medical specialties, an interactive educational section with quizzes, and a listing of events are also provided.
This educational effort marks another step in Australia’s concerted effort to realize biosimilars’ savings potential. Among its efforts has been the implementation of what it terms “uptake drivers” as a matter of national policy: encouraging prescribing of biosimilars over branded drugs for new patients, and providing a faster and simpler preapproval process for patients to receive a biosimilar drug than a branded drug. The drivers, says the government, are expected to be time-limited initiatives that will support the acceptance these products and positively impact market behavior.
The first product to become subject to the uptake drivers was etanercept in December 2017, followed by follitropin alfa in 2018 and infliximab in 2019. The government also published fact sheets on the biosimilars, with separate documents made available to prescribers, pharmacists, and patients or their caregivers, as part of the initiative.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.