Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: Marcus, do you see that as well? And, probably, rheumatology has been much more affected.
Marcus H. Snow, MD: Absolutely.
Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: In regard to oncology, there is political correctness of putting in step edits and formulary management, maybe, for growth factors, but not typically for therapeutics. But, in rheumatology, this has been the way for a decade.
Marcus H. Snow, MD: Yes. For example, if I’m starting a patient on a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, I will write for etanercept or adalimumab. That medication will be altered by the formulary of the insurance company of this patient, and usually it will be altered with a preferred product. There are 5 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on the market. Usually, they prefer 2 or 3, or they’ll shunt me one way or the other. In general, we have no head-to-head studies of these medications. But, we generally think of them as equivalent. That’s the reality.
Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: But, there are scenarios where—maybe in early, rapidly progressive rheumatoid arthritis—it may be that these agents don’t work as well, and you want to use a different mechanism of action drug to begin with, or you may want to be able to challenge that. Can you successfully challenge those decisions?
Marcus H. Snow, MD: You can try. Generally, the lack of head-to-head data has, in essence, kept some of these discussions from happening. I do think that, in rheumatology, we tend to think of aggressive control. It doesn’t really matter, necessarily, which agent you use, but we need to get control quickly. And whether that involves simply methotrexate or whether it involves a biologic medication, we have tons of options, thankfully, right now. You can push along. The biggest determining factor for me, when I’m prescribing medications, is my patient side effect profile. If they have a history of cancer, I may shy away from one medication or another. If they have a history of multiple sclerosis, I’m going to head away from the tumor necrosis factor family. Obviously, you have to choose based on your patient profile, so that’s where my objection to a step edit that exists will end up in a peer-to-peer review. Depending on the situation, that has been successful at times. But, it takes time, and it takes effort. It takes me taking time out of clinic. It takes a delay from my patient. We know that rheumatoid arthritis is a progressive disease, and the longer you wait to get control of their disease, the more damage you can have.
Hope S. Rugo, MD: Can I just be clear? If you’re talking about a step edit, it’s like using the same drug but a different brand?
Marcus H. Snow, MD: No.
Hope S. Rugo, MD: It’s a different drug that they want you to use.
Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: With the same mechanism of action.
Marcus H. Snow, MD: So, for the most part, if you graduate from our traditional disease modifying agents—methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine—and with few exceptions, you have to start off with those, if I wanted to move to a medication that is not a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, it would be rejected by the pharmacy until I fail 2 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Once that happens, then the armamentarium is opened up from there.
Hope S. Rugo, MD: And that’s what a step edit is. They say, “No, you can’t.”
Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: Yes. You have to take “this” step before you can go…
Hope S. Rugo, MD: To the next step.
Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: To the next step, yes.
Spanish Real-World Study: Adalimumab Biosimilar MSB11022 Safe, Effective in IBD
May 18th 2024A real-world study in Spain on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients found no meaningful changes in clinical or biochemical markers or differences in effectiveness between the adalimumab originator and the biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio; Fresenius Kabi) in adalimumab-naïve patients.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Panelists Call for Consistent Education, Support to Improve Patient Comfort With Biosimilars
May 15th 2024At the Festival of Biologics USA, panelists stressed the need for patient-centered communication and education to boost comfort with biosimilars, emphasizing consistent support from health care providers despite restrictive payer policies.
Biosimilars Rheumatology Roundup for February 2024—Podcast Edition
March 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® revisited all the major rheumatology biosimilar news from February 2024, including the FDA approval of the 10th adalimumab biosimilar, the promise for an oral delivery system for ustekinumab, and the impact of adalimumab products on COVID-19 antibodies.
Review: Product Attributes Relevant to Injection-Site Pain, Adalimumab Treatment
May 4th 2024A review article summarizes the product attributes of reference and biosimilar adalimumab products, such as formulation with or without citrate, delivery volume, and needle gauge, relevant to patients’ experience of injection-site pain.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.