Preventing the nocebo effect requires a demonstration of confidence in biosimilars from all health care practitioners, including pharmacists, experts said in a newly published rheumatology treatment guidance document.
Rheumatology experts from Canada have developed pharmacist guidance for switching patients with rheumatologic disorders to biosimilars, which they hope also will be of use to the pharmacist community outside Canada.
The guidance was developed as Canadian provinces increasingly move toward mandatory switching to biosimilars to save money and improve access to care.
“New classes of antirheumatic drugs including janus kinase inhibitors (JAKs), along with the introduction of biosimilars are presenting more opportunity for therapeutic changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These changes are often complex due to the nature of the drugs, along with an associated administrative burden,” they wrote. The group included physicians and pharmacists.
Consensus on Switching
In developing the guidance, the authors convened a panel of experts moderated by a facilitator and strived for consensus on key switching issues, primarily considerations prior to, during, and after transition to another biologic or JAK.
The panel paid close attention to the risks of the nocebo effect when switching therapies. Nocebo is when outcomes are affected by patient attitudes toward the therapy. The panel strongly recommended that pharmacists could best avoid nocebo by demonstrating confidence in the switch by using positive verbal language.
Consistent messaging from all involved health care providers was also seen as important to avoid this problem. “The participants did not see the value of using a validated tool to screen and assess patient attitudes toward the therapeutic transition as a proxy for potential nocebo,” authors of the guidance wrote.
Although biosimilars are not precise copies of originator drug products, and even originator biologics differ from batch to batch, scientific evidence has shown that “a single switch from a reference to a biosimilar is safe and effective. Additionally, clinical trials assessing switch from a bio-originator to a biosimilar have not demonstrated any loss of efficacy, increase in adverse events, or increased immunogenicity,” the authors wrote.
The group recommended that any concerns about potentially poor outcomes from a transition should be discussed with the prescribing rheumatologist prior to the switch.
Clinical Considerations
The authors provided a list of clinical considerations pharmacists should be aware of during a therapeutic switch. These were based on the mechanism of action for each therapeutic category. For example, with the use of tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitors, pharmacists should be aware of injection site reactions, upper respiratory tract infection, or symptoms of congestive heart failure.
After the transition, the best tool available to assess disease activity is a visual analog scale for the assessment of pain, fatigue, and quality of life, the group agreed. Following close behind in the ranking of utility were the RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3) tool, which is a disease activity index based on a questionnaire, and the Likert Scale, which measures patient agreement with various prewritten statements.
Pain, fatigue, and quality of life are helpful in assessing for primary response, which is whether the patient has any initial benefit from the agent. The pharmacist is best positioned to monitor for these outcomes, the authors wrote, because the patient will likely interact with the pharmacist for refills prior to a follow-up appointment with the rheumatologist.
“Although a lack of peak-response early in treatment is not a particularly concerning, a series of uncontrolled or frequent flare ups as compared to baseline after 3 months of therapy would be cause for immediate referral,” they wrote.
Asked when a pharmacist should refer a patient to the rheumatologist for an earlier-than-scheduled follow up, the group emphasized the seriousness and severity of individual factors such as infection, repeated flare ups, and surgery; it said these should be the basis of such determinations.
“The pharmacist is well positioned to monitor and resolve issues relating to adherence and safety,” the authors wrote.
In their clinical considerations tool, the authors provided a “before starting” checklist to ensure a smooth transition to the substitute agent.
One of the questions considered by the panel but not addressed was how to measure the effectiveness of current therapy vs new therapy. “Participants felt it was inappropriate to attempt this as it may create the impression that we expect a change in effectiveness post-transition. This could lead to a nocebo effect,” the authors wrote.
Reference
Choquette D, Chan J, Bardi M, et al. Monitoring the transition of patients on biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: consensus guidance for pharmacists. Pharm Pract. 2021;19(3):2377. doi:10.18549/PharmPract.2021.3.2377
Data Show Promise for Adalimumab Biosimilars to Deliver on Safety, Cost Savings
May 16th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s annual meeting provided hope that despite low uptake so far, adalimumab biosimilars can deliver on the promise of comparable safety and efficacy with the originator in multiple disease states, as well as cost savings.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Partnering for Biosimilar Security: India's Role in US Health Care Savings, Supply Chain Stability
May 9th 2024As Indian pharmaceutical companies supplied 4 of every 10 prescriptions in the US in 2022, generating $1.3 trillion in health care savings, a new IQVIA report highlights concerns about supply chain risks and advocates for partnerships to bolster biosimilar security and overall supply chain resilience.