In its report, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) notes that it “expects that the bill’s provisions would allow generic drugs (including biosimilar versions of biologics) to enter the market earlier, on average, than they would under current law.” Additionally, CBO said that enacting the legislation would reduce federal spending on prescription drugs.
Last week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) announced its cost estimate of implementing S. 974, the Creating and Restoring Equal Access to Equivalent Samples Act of 2018, otherwise known as the CREATES Act.
If adopted, the CREATES Act would create a legal pathway to allow generic and biosimilar drug developers to bring civil lawsuits against manufacturers of brand-name drugs if “sufficient quantities of reference samples of a branded product are not made available for premarket testing.”
Additionally, the CREATES Act also seeks to remove a statutory requirement that manufacturers of generic or biosimilar versions of certain drugs that carry a significant risk of serious adverse effects would use the same risk management system as the reference product. Instead, it would allow the FDA to enable those manufacturers to use comparable safety systems on a case-by-case basis. In recent months, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, has spoken out about this issue, and has made it a priority of the agency to tackle Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) abuse that stalls competition in the market.
Click here to read more about the CREATES Act.
In its report, CBO notes that it “expects that the bill’s provisions would allow generic drugs (including biosimilar versions of biologics) to enter the market earlier, on average, than they would under current law.” Additionally, CBO said that enacting the legislation would reduce federal spending on prescription drugs.
In total, CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that implementing the bill would reduce spending by $3.3 billion over the 2019 to 2028 period; increase revenues by $600 million over the same period; reduce unified budget deficits by $3.9 billion over the same period; and reduce spending subject to appropriation, on net, by $87 million over the 2019 to 2023 period.
Despite broad bipartisan support, the CREATES Act has faced opposition from pharmaceutical companies and industry trade groups, such as the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which spent an estimated $10 million on lobbying efforts—including efforts to stall progress of the CREATES Act–in the first quarter of 2018.
The bill is currently up for vote in the Senate, where it has been pending since it was reported on June 14, 2018.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.