The results of Voltaire-X could persuade the FDA to authorize automatic substitution of the adalimumab biosimilar Cyltezo for its reference product (Humira), investigators believe.
Boehringer Ingelheim believes it is on its way toward gaining perhaps the first interchangeable designation for a biosimilar, based on results of VOLTAIRE-X, a phase 3 randomized study that compared pharmacokinetic properties for the adalimumab reference product (Humira, RP; 40 mg/0.8 mL) with those of the adalimumab biosimilar Cyltezo (BI 695501) in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.
Patients received RP continuously or switched between the biosimilar and RP, and investigators concluded that patients who were switched multiple times between RP and Cyltezo experienced similar clinical outcomes in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety.
“This study is, to our knowledge, the first to report outcomes that meet the US FDA’s criteria for interchangeable biologic designation,” investigators stated in findings presented at the American Academy of Dermatology 2021 virtual meeting this month.
There are 29 FDA approved biosimilars but none of them has an interchangeable designation, meaning that, depending on individual state laws, pharmacists could fill prescriptions with biosimilars rather than the originator product without approval from the prescribing physician. It is generally assumed that the lack of interchangeable designations is a chief impediment to patient and physician confidence in biosimilars, which are FDA approved as being “highly similar” to originator brands, and just as safe and efficacious, with no clinically meaningful differences.
For an interchangeable designation from the FDA, a biosimilar is “expected to produce the same clinical result as the reference product in any given patient” and “not present greater risks in terms of safety or diminished efficacy from alternating or switching between the interchangeable candidate and reference product,” Boehringer Ingelheim noted, quoting from FDA guidelines.
Cyltezo was approved in 2017 and is scheduled for launch on July 1, 2023, based on a settlement with AbbVie. Boehringer Ingelheim anticipates an FDA decision on the application for interchangeability in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Study Findings
In VOLTAIRE-X, investigators evaluated area under the curve (AUC), or drug concentration over time in the bloodstream; Cmax, or peak concentration after administration of the first dose; presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), a measure of immunogenicity and the body’s response to adalimumab; and presence of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs), which can diminish or boost biosimilar effectiveness.
They randomized 238 patients to the switching (n = 118) or continuous treatment (n = 120) arms. In the switching and continuous treatment cohorts, the adjusted mean AUC was 2025.83 μg.h/mL vs 1925.90 μg.h/mL, respectively (ratio of adjusted means, 105.19%; 90.2% CI, 96.58-114.64).
Adjusted mean Cmax was 7.08 μg.h/mL and 7.00 μg.h/mL in the switching and continuous arms, respectively (ratio of adjusted means, 101.14%; 90.2% CI, 93.26-109.70). Investigators concluded the 90.2% CIs for AUC and Cmax were within the acceptable bioequivalence boundaries of 80% to 125%.
In the evaluation for immunogenicity, investigators found that at week 32 similar proportions of patients had developed ADAs in the switching vs continuous treatment arms (90.2% vs 94.5%, respectively), and nAb results were similar also between the 2 arms (41.1% and 41.8%, respectively).
In the switching vs continuous treatment arms, the proportions of patients who achieved a psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score of 75 (75% or better showing improvement over baseline PASI scores) were also similar: 84.7% vs 79.0%, respectively (90% CI, –2.45%-13.96%).
The proportions of patients with physician global assessment (PGA) scores ≤1 at week 32 were also similar between the switching and continuous treatment arms: 70.3% vs 64.7%. The PGA is 5- to 6-point measure for disease severity.
On safety, investigators noted that following randomization, the percentages of patients who experienced at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) were similar in both arms (56.8% and 62.5%, respectively). A slightly higher percentage of patients experienced drug-related TEAEs in the continuous treatment arm (18.3% vs 11.9%).
Reference
Menter A, McCabe D, Lang B, et al. Phase III, randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes between patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis receiving adalimumab reference product continuously versus those who switched between BI 695501 and adalimumab RP. Presented at: American Academy of Dermatology 2021; April 23-25, 2021.
Data Show Promise for Adalimumab Biosimilars to Deliver on Safety, Cost Savings
May 16th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s annual meeting provided hope that despite low uptake so far, adalimumab biosimilars can deliver on the promise of comparable safety and efficacy with the originator in multiple disease states, as well as cost savings.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Patients With IBD Experience Nocebo Effect Post Mandatory Switch to Biosimilar
May 11th 2024In Canada, a study on patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) switching to infliximab or adalimumab biosimilars found no change in clinical remission or antidrug antibodies after 24 weeks, but 13% experienced the nocebo effect, leading to one-fifth discontinuing therapy.
Biosimilars Rheumatology Roundup for February 2024—Podcast Edition
March 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® revisited all the major rheumatology biosimilar news from February 2024, including the FDA approval of the 10th adalimumab biosimilar, the promise for an oral delivery system for ustekinumab, and the impact of adalimumab products on COVID-19 antibodies.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.