A retrospective study of rituximab biosimilars Truxima and Riximyo demonstrated comparable response and survival for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Using data from a population-based cancer registry in the Netherlands, investigators found similar response and survival rates for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received either rituximab originator (Rituxan) or biosimilars. They found that 3-year overall survival (OS) was 73% in both the originator and biosimilar groups (P = .855), and overall response rates (ORRs) were 85% in the originator group and 84% in the biosimilar group (P = .326).
Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to the B-cell surface antigen CD20, has been “the backbone of every treatment regimen in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas” since its approval by the FDA in 1997 and European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 1998, the authors said. And in the Netherlands, rituximab biosimilars were rapidly incorporated into the treatment regiment for these cancers.
Two rituximab biosimilars, CT-P10 (Truxima; Celltrion) and GP2013 (Riximyo; Sandoz), were approved by the EMA in 2017. That year, the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists began to incorporate rituximab biosimilars into the standard of care. By 2018, the authors said, 91% of the rituximab purchased in the Netherlands was biosimilar product rather than originator, leading to a 43% reduction in annual expenditure on rituximab in 2019 compared with 2015.
The investigators noted that rituximab biosimilars were approved by the EMA based on studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and naïve follicular lymphoma. Until now, data on ORR and OS rates with rituximab biosimilars in DLBCL, they said, have been “limited to small postmarketing studies.”
Investigators identified 4429 patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with DLBCL who were 18 or older, received a diagnosis of DLBCL between 2014 and 2018, and received at least 1 cycle of R-CHOP (a combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), which they noted is standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. There were 3553 patients treated with rituximab originator and 876 treated with a biosimilar. Of those treated with a biosimilar, 86% received CT-P10 and 14%, GP2013.
Similar Response and Survival Rates
Complete response was achieved by 74% of patients in the reference cohort and 72% in the biosimilar group; 11% in each cohort achieved partial response (Figure).
Overall 3-year survival was 73% in each group. The risk of mortality was also similar between groups in a multivariate analysis that adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, International Prognostic Index score, and number of cycles of R-CHOP in the biosimilar group (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.05; P = .182) compared with the originator group.
Sensitivity Analysis
Because the study included patient data from several years prior to when rituximab biosimilars were routinely used in clinical practice, the median follow-up times were 62 months for the reference product and 32 months for the biosimilars. The authors used sensitivity analysis to account for this difference.
First, an analysis of 3-year overall survival was conducted excluding all patients treated with the reference product who were diagnosed prior to biosimilar approval. Analyzing just the 370 patients treated with the reference product and 876 patients treated with biosimilars who were diagnosed between April 2017 and December 2018, 3-year survival rates were similar, 74% and 73%, respectively (P = .798).
In the second part of the sensitivity analysis, the researchers compared 3-year survival rates in patients receiving the originator before (n = 3183) and after (n = 370) biosimilar approval. They found 3-year survival rates of 73% for those diagnosed prior to April 2017 and 74% for those diagnosed afterward. “Overall, the results of the sensitivity analyses were similar to those of the primary analyses,” the authors wrote.
According to the authors, theirs is the first population-based study following EMA approval of the first rituximab biosimilar to investigate survival in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with the rituximab originator or biosimilar. They wrote that their data suggest that patients with DLBCL “benefit equally” from rituximab originator or biosimilars combined with CHOP treatment. They acknowledged “the lack of detailed information on dosage per cycle at the patient level and treatment-related toxicities, including infusion-related reactions,” as limitations of their study.
Reference
Brink M, Kahle XU, Vermaat JSP, et al. Impact of rituximab biosimilars on overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a Dutch population-based study. Blood Adv. 2021;5(15):2958-2964. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004295
Panelists Call for Consistent Education, Support to Improve Patient Comfort With Biosimilars
May 15th 2024At the Festival of Biologics USA, panelists stressed the need for patient-centered communication and education to boost comfort with biosimilars, emphasizing consistent support from health care providers despite restrictive payer policies.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Partnering for Biosimilar Security: India's Role in US Health Care Savings, Supply Chain Stability
May 9th 2024As Indian pharmaceutical companies supplied 4 of every 10 prescriptions in the US in 2022, generating $1.3 trillion in health care savings, a new IQVIA report highlights concerns about supply chain risks and advocates for partnerships to bolster biosimilar security and overall supply chain resilience.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.