At the American Conference Institute (ACI)’s Summit on Biosimilars Conference, held June 25-27 in New York, New York, panelists Crystal Kuntz, vice president of healthcare policy and research at Biotechnology Innovation Organization, and David Korn, vice president of intellectual property and law at Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, provided an overview of recent policy and legislative updates in regard to biosimilars.
At the American Conference Institute (ACI)’s Summit on Biosimilars meeting, held June 25-27 in New York, New York, panelists Crystal Kuntz, vice president of healthcare policy and research at Biotechnology Innovation Organization, and David Korn, vice president of intellectual property and law at Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America provided an overview of recent policy and legislative updates in regard to biosimilars.
The panelists opened up the discussion by reviewing legislative updates to the space that have taken place in the last year. According to Korn, although not directly focused on biosimilars, the passage of the FDA Reauthorization Act in August 2017 was the most significant development, as “The [legislation] covers everything from fees relating to drugs, and devices.”
Building upon the Biosimilar User Fee Act that was signed into law in 2012, the FDARA clarified some of the fee structures listed within the document and included some commitments from the FDA in regard to the review process for biosimilars. Specifically, the law states that the FDA is committed to reviewing 90% of first time biosimilar applications as well as resubmissions that it receives within 10 months of the 60-day filing date.
In addition, Kuntz discussed recent proposals made by the Trump Administration, where “a lot of the rhetoric we’ve been hearing boils down to the administration saying that ‘someone needs to do something about drug pricing.’”
Kuntz noted that although the release of Trump’s blueprint to address the cost of drugs in May was a good start, “the document is very broad, and hints at things the administration would like to achieve but contains no specific policy proposals.”
In summarizing action taken by various government departments in the past year, Kuntz presented on CMS’ move to lower cost-sharing for biosimilars, as well as the reversal of another CMS decision that now allows for each biosimilars to receive its own J code tied to billing through the Medicare program.
As for the future, panelists agreed that they are keeping an eye on the proposed Creating and Restoring Equal Access to Equivalent Samples (CREATES) Act, and the potential for movement on the Affordable and Safe Prescription Drug Importation Act that was introduced in Congress February 2017. Although decision on the Act is still pending, it could have a potential impact on biologics. In addition, both noted the importance of future developments tied to the blueprint to reduce drug pricing, and they expect to see more proposals from CMS that potentially allow health plans to have more flexibility in the drugs they cover.
Data Show Promise for Adalimumab Biosimilars to Deliver on Safety, Cost Savings
May 16th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s annual meeting provided hope that despite low uptake so far, adalimumab biosimilars can deliver on the promise of comparable safety and efficacy with the originator in multiple disease states, as well as cost savings.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.