Gillian Woollett, MA, Dphil, vice president and head of regulatory strategy and policy at Samsung Bioepis, reviews some of the presentations, including her own, from the Festival of Biologics conference.
Gillian Woollett, MA, Dphil, vice president and head of regulatory strategy and policy at Samsung Bioepis as well as an Advisory Board member for The Center for Biosimilars®, summarizes some of the presentations, including her own, from the Festival of Biologics conference that was held in San Diego, California.
Transcript
What presentations at the Festival of Biologics did you enjoy checking out and what do you hope to see more of at future conferences?
Woollett: It was an interesting meeting, of course. With FDA, it's always important to see what they're doing. Unfortunately, they have a travel ban. So, they weren't in person, but there were videos. And they had some nice updates. I mean, there's a certain preoccupation with user fees, because it's critical to the funding of the FDA. But in general, I think it was just a catch up for everyone. And FDA also had a session on biosimilar educational materials. So, those are worth checking out on their website. They've done a lot of work on that over the last year or so. So, they were flagging some of those presentations. And I think more than anything, it was just catching up with progress. And of course, everybody anticipating 2023.
To reference to the title of your presentation at the Festival of Biologics, what does global progress with biosimilars mean for the United States?
Woollett: So, what was interesting on that is there's the presumption that the US is late. But the US is only late in the sense that some of the IP [intellectual property] issues that have meant that products were approved later and launched later. But the science in the US has always been somewhat ahead, given that FDA led the world with comparability. So, it was both a discussion that the US is ready as a scientific and regulatory matter, but also that we're going to have this interesting opportunity of experience from elsewhere by the time those same biosimilars are approved in the US. So, there was a discussion around real world evidence, the fact that there has been no case of any unusual or unexpected adverse event with any of the biosimilars approved in Europe or the US. So, that was all good news. And then the issues are around, of course, the appearance of delays, but I think the FDA is ready. And some of the arguments about more efficient development and perhaps reductions in the clinical trials, the confirmatory head-to-head clinical trials, are being led by Europe too. So, if you've got the experience and you've got the clinical trials done, there's progress towards global reference. I think there's an expectation of opportunities for efficiency all around.
Data Show Promise for Adalimumab Biosimilars to Deliver on Safety, Cost Savings
May 16th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s annual meeting provided hope that despite low uptake so far, adalimumab biosimilars can deliver on the promise of comparable safety and efficacy with the originator in multiple disease states, as well as cost savings.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.