HHS has rescinded its approval of a major charity, Caring Voice Coalition, after the charity allowed pharma donors improper influence over the nonprofit.
HHS has rescinded its approval of a major charity, Caring Voice Coalition, after the charity allowed pharma donors improper influence over the nonprofit.
According to a letter from HHS’ Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the charity provided drug makers with data that could allow them to see if their contributions were assisting their own customers, potentially giving companies “greater ability to raise the prices of their drugs while insulating patients from the immediate out-of-pocket effects.”
Under federal law, drug companies cannot give direct co-pay assistance to patients covered by Medicare because such a practice could steer patients from one drug to another. Drug makers can, however, donate to independent charities that help cover drug costs of Medicare patients if they do not influence the operations of those charities.
The OIG said that, “effective immediately,” it is rescinding its previous approval of the charity. Caring Voice “allowed donors to directly or indirectly influence the identification or delineation” of its disease categories, which contradicted previous reports that it would not do so, said the letter. OIG’s findings are similar to issues brought to light by Bloomberg Businessweek in May 2016, which found that Caring Voice gave special treatment to patients of some company donors.
The decision to eliminate Caring Voice’s approval comes amid a wide-ranging investigation by the Justice Department into pharma’s influence over charities. Jazz pharmaceuticals has recently received three subpoenas from the Justice Department relate to its relationship with co-pay charities. Celgene Corp., United Therapeutics Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Gilead Sciences Inc., have also received similar subpoenas.
According to Bloomberg, Caring Voice may be forced to close after having its approval rescinded, potentially impacting patients’ ability to pay for expensive medications.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.