The MAGIC Act would amend the Affordable Care Act to allow chemically synthesized insulins to be approved under abbreviated new drug applications.
When the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act was passed as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) a decade ago, the United States started a countdown to March 2020, when some drugs—including insulins—that have historically been regulated under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act will transition to licensure under the Public Health Service (PHS) Act.
As such, insulins will no longer be treated as drugs but as biologics as a regulatory matter, and subsequent entry insulins will no longer be addressed as follow-on products but will be eligible for authorization under the biosimilar approval pathway. Insulin biosimilars approved under the PHS Act will be able to seek interchangeable designations for the first time, and interchangeable insulins will be, pursuant to state laws, eligible for substitution at the pharmacy level.
While regulators, drug makers, and law makers have had the past 10 years to prepare for this regulatory rollover, some legislators have recently expressed concern about the transition and have introduced related bills.
Last month, Representative Mike Kelly, R-Pennsylvania, who is the vice chair of the Diabetes Caucus and a patient with diabetes, introduced H.R.4244, the Market Access for Generic Insulin Competition (MAGIC) Act of 2019. The MAGIC Act would amend the ACA to allow chemically synthesized insulins to be approved under abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) under the FD&C Act.
As a result, subsequent-entry insulin products would be generic drugs, not biosimilars.
According to a statement by Kelly, the BPCIA as written “permanently closes the door on generic insulin production after March 2020,” and “The MAGIC Act will ensure that federal law and regulatory barriers at the FDA no longer stand in the way of a competitive market for insulin.”
Kelly’s office notes that the representative contacted FDA Commissioner Ned Sharpless, MD to request information as to why insulin is not eligible for approval via the ANDA process and did not receive a comment from the FDA.
This latest bill comes shortly after another item of legislation, S.2103, was introduced in Congress to address perceived shortcomings of the BPCIA. This Senate bill, the Affordable Insulin Approvals Now Act, would amend the BPCIA to require that insulins with filing dates prior to December 31, 2019, would continue to be reviewed and approved under section 505 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, even if the review and approval process were to continue past the March transition date for insulins.
These drugs would be deemed to be licensed as biologics effective on either the transition date or the date of approval, whichever comes later.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.