Universal access to affordable essential medicines remains an unmet goal, and while the World Health Organization has been attempting to address this problem through prequalification of drugs like insulin to help ensure access for patients in low-resource areas, costs for many products remain prohibitive.
Universal access to affordable essential medicines remains an unmet goal, and while the World Health Organization (WHO) has been attempting to address this problem through prequalification of drugs like insulin to help ensure access for patients in low-resource areas, costs for many products remain prohibitive.
Manufacturing costs are often cited as one reason for steep prices, particularly for drugs like biologics. However, in a recent paper, a group of authors sought to develop an algorithm to estimate the cost of injectable medicines on the WHO’s List of Essential Medicines (EML) and to use that algorithm to estimate the prices that would be expected given an average profit margin.
Injectable drugs on the WHO list include products like anti—tumor necrosis factor therapies and their biosimilars, as well as anticancer biologics and their biosimilars.
The investigators derived data on the cost of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) exported from India using an online database of customs declarations in order to design their algorithm to estimate cost-based drug pricing. In total, 96 drugs on the list had API data available.
They also included costs to convert APIs into finished pharmaceutical products using the eMIT database, and they collected prices on drugs from databases in the United Kingdom, South Africa, and India.
They found that prices based on cost plus an average profit margin would range from a low of $0.24 for salbutamol to a high of $449 for a 500-mg vial of rituximab. However, a majority of injectables had prices significantly higher than the estimated cost-based prices in the United Kingdom and South Africa. In total, 77% of medicines had prices over the estimated cost-based price in England, as did 62% of medicines in South Africa. In India, 85% of medicines had prices below the estimated cost-based price.
The products that had the highest ratios of lowest current price versus the estimated cost-based price included filgrastim in the United Kingdom (radio, 112.6) and insulin injection in India (ratio, 2.7).
“Most injectable medicines on the EML can be manufactured at very low cost,” write the authors. Although they note that the wide range of medicines included in the analysis makes it difficult to generalize about the appropriateness of pricing, and that the analysis was unable to detect anticompetitive strategies that may raise prices, drugs with prices significantly higher than their cost to manufacture may represent a substantial burden on healthcare systems.
Estimating the cost to produce these drugs, the authors say, could help governments to develop drug pricing mechanisms to reduce some of this burden.
Reference
Gotham D, Barber MJ, Hill AM. Estimation of cost-based prices for injectable medicines in the WHO essential medicines list. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027780.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.