MIL60 bevacizumab biosimilar candidate demonstrates equivalence to the originator Avastin in a population of Chinese patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in a frontline setting.
Investigators in China reported positive equivalence findings from a phase 3 trial of a bevacizumab biosimilar candidate (MIL60) and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with recurrent or advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
The findings, presented in poster form at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2021, showed MIL60 is highly similar to the originator bevacizumab (Avastin) in terms of pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and safety. MIL60 is a biosimilar candidate under development by Beijing Mabworks Biotech.
Trial Design
Patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and no previous history of systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1 to 6 cycles of 15-mg/kg intravenous MIL60 plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 253, full analysis set [FAS]) or similar dosing of reference bevacizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 255, FAS).
Patients then received MIL60 maintenance therapy (7.5 mg/kg). This afforded further evaluation opportunity through longer exposure.
The primary end point was the 12-week objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee (IRC), and secondary end points included 18-week ORR, duration of response (DoR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
The IRC-assessed FAS ORRs for the biosimilar and reference cohorts were 48.6% (95% CI, 42.6%-57.8%) and 43.1% (95% CI, 37.4%-52.1%), respectively. Investigators noted the ORR finding of 48.6% for the Chinese patient population was significantly higher than in Western patients previously studied (38%).
Investigators observed no significant differences in median DoR, PFS, or OS. Median OS was 19.3 months and was comparable to previous study findings.
No patients in either cohort achieved complete response. The partial response rate was 48.6% and 43.1% in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively. Stable disease was achieved by 44.3% and 45.5%, respectively.
Investigators reported no significant difference between the study arms in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In the biosimilar and reference cohorts, grade 3 or higher TEAEs were 70.3% and 72.6%, respectively; serious adverse events were 28.1% and 28.6%, and treatment-related TEAEs were 78.9% and 81.1%.
PK parameters also were similar for patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC.
Reference
Wang J, Wan R, Dong X, et al. Efficacy and safety of MIL60, a bevacizumab biosimilar, in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin in the patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study. Presented at: ESMO Congress 2021; September 16-21, 2021. Poster 1339P.
Data Show Promise for Adalimumab Biosimilars to Deliver on Safety, Cost Savings
May 16th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s annual meeting provided hope that despite low uptake so far, adalimumab biosimilars can deliver on the promise of comparable safety and efficacy with the originator in multiple disease states, as well as cost savings.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.