This week, drug maker Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit against Mylan in a New Jersey district court. Sanofi’s suit alleges that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for its originator insulin glargine, Lantus.
This week, drug maker Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit against Mylan in a New Jersey district court. Sanofi’s suit alleges that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for its originator insulin glargine, Lantus.
The suit was triggered by Mylan’s filing of a New Drug Application (NDA) with the FDA for a pre-filled pen and a drug vial presentation of a follow-on insulin glargine (in the United States, insulins are regulated as drugs and not as biologics; hence, drug makers must submit NDAs rather than biologics license applications for follow-ons of originator products). According to Sanofi, the Mylan NDA included a challenge to all of Sanofi’s patents listed for Lantus in the FDA’s orange book.
Mylan’s filing of an NDA for its proposed insulin glargine follows the recent release of data demonstrating comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity with Lantus, as well as the follow-on’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence with the reference drug. Mylan, working together with India-based partner Biocon, is also seeking European approval for its product; in September, Biocon received a certificate of compliance from the European Union for its manufacturing facility in Malaysia where it plans to produce the insulin. Approval of the facility was welcome news for Biocon; high operational costs related to the Malaysian facility had been partially responsible for a 51% drop in Biocon’s second-quarter net profits, despite the company’s strong sales of insulins.
Sanofi faces challenges from other drug developers who seek a share of the Lantus market; in July, the FDA granted Merck’s follow-on insulin glargine a tentative approval, but will not provide the drug with a final approval until patent litigation, brought by Sanofi, has concluded. Sanofi’s suit triggered an automatic stay of 30 months.
Already on the US market is Boehringer Ingelheim’s (BI) Basaglar, the first FDA-approved insulin glargine follow-on, which launched in 2016 after a lengthy patent litigation with Sanofi. Competition from Basaglar led to steep declines in insulin market share for Sanofi in the second quarter of 2017; Sanofi’s US sales of Lantus and Toujeo (a second insulin glargine) dropped by 23.9%. CEO Oliver Brandicourt has alerted investors that the company’s fortunes were unlikely to change in the remainder of 2017, and warned that the company could see accelerated declines in sales of its insulins as it faced further competition.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.