Wayne Winegarden, PhD, talked about the issues and benefits of the FDA's switch to a biologics regulatory pathway for certain products, especially insulin, during the World Biosimilar Congress USA 2020 at the Festival of Biologics USA in San Diego, California.
Wayne Winegarden, PhD, is a senior fellow in business and economics as well as the director for the Center for Medical Economics and Innovation at the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco, California.
Transcript:
Please explain the significance of the regulatory change to the BPCIA.
It's been 10 years since the [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act] BPCIA has passed, and what that meant was the biologics that had come out previously--insulin would be the most important one--were regulated under the FDA small chemical market, and now they're going to be migrating and transferring over to the [biologics license application] BLA. From my perspective, I think there's logic to making the transfer. How that was done was very disconcerting, because it created this dead zone, is how it's been referred to. It was [maybe] 10 or 12 months--people can debate that, but it was a substantial period where you disincentivized competition, because if you had--let's say, for insulin--if you had submitted some type of [application for] a new biosimilar, whatever it would have been, for insulin, and you didn't get it finished prior to the transfer on March 23, well, it's lost, and you'd have to go through that whole process all over again. And it's really too costly. So, what it basically encouraged people to do is shut down any type of innovation to any type of competitor [products] for a very substantial period of time. My guess is it's been at least a year, if not longer. Whatever it's been, hopefully that's coming to an end soon as we transfer over, but we've certainly, I think, paid a price in terms of [no increase in] competition...all that progress has been shut down. That's a real loss to patients, and hopefully, that's coming to an end.
Partnering for Biosimilar Security: India's Role in US Health Care Savings, Supply Chain Stability
May 9th 2024As Indian pharmaceutical companies supplied 4 of every 10 prescriptions in the US in 2022, generating $1.3 trillion in health care savings, a new IQVIA report highlights concerns about supply chain risks and advocates for partnerships to bolster biosimilar security and overall supply chain resilience.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Eye on Pharma: EU Ustekinumab Approval; New Golimumab Data; Evernorth Adds Humira Biosimilar
April 29th 2024The European Union gained a new ustekinumab biosimilar; Alvotech released positive results from a clinical trial evaluating a golimumab biosimilar and the reference products (Simponi and Simponi Aria), and Evernorth announced that it is set to cover an adalimumab biosimilar at zero cost to patients.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.