Last week, drug manufacturer Merck announced that it will be taking part in several strategies to establish “responsible pricing” going forward, joining the ranks of some of the latest companies taking similar actions, including Novartis and Pfizer.
Last week, drug manufacturer Merck announced that it will be taking part in several strategies to establish “responsible pricing” going forward, joining the ranks of some of the latest companies taking similar actions, including Novartis and Pfizer.
However, the question remains whether patients will be able to feel any cost savings from halts to price hikes; several analysts have shared doubt about Merck’s drug pricing plan, stating that the company’s pricing strategy remains comparable to its regular strategy. The pricing announcement included a pledge not to raise the average net price across its drug portfolio beyond the rate of inflation, but according to Vamil Divan, a Credit Suisse analyst, this is not a change from previous strategy because “we do not believe they have been getting much more than this level of net pricing in recent years anyway,” reported Fierce Pharma.
In addition, Merck announced that it would be cutting the price of elbasvir/grazoprevir, sold as Zepatier, for the treatment of hepatitis C, by 60% under this new initiative. Notably, this drug has historically struggled to compete with cheaper, shorter-course treatments available elsewhere on the market, in addition to there being a lack of newly eligible patients as highly effective medicines are reducing the number of patients who require treatment. According to Merck’s first-quarter earnings for 2018, Zepatier’s sales were $131 million, or nearly $100 million lower than anticipated.
Merck also announced that it plans to cut the price of 6 products by 10%, including finasteride (Proscar) for the treatment of prostate cancer, and carbidopa-levodopa (Sinemet) for the treatment of Parkinson disease, among other products. However, the combined sales of these 6 products amounted to less than 0.1% of Merck’s total sales in 2017, according to Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat, also as reported by Fierce Pharma.
This pricing announcement was joined by a similar pledge from Roche to delay hiking prices for the rest of the year. However, according to Bloomberg, the company had already instituted the second of its usual 2 annual increases at the time of the announcement.
Roche notified the US government of its intentions on July 11, stating that the health system needs to focus on “long-term, system-wide solutions that lower costs [and] we’re committed to being part of the solution.” However, already in July, Roche had raised the prices of 9 medicines by an average of 3%, including those of its top 3 drugs, trastuzumab (Herceptin), rituximab (Rituxan), and bevacizumab (Avastin), all products that are targeted by biosimilar developers.
In a statement, Roche said its US unit’s annual average net price increase, weighted by sales, has been about 3%, which is in line with the medical consumer price index.
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Cordavis Report Outlines Strategies for Biosimilar Development, Access in the US Health Care Market
May 8th 2024Cordavis, a CVS Healthspire company, released a report detailing the current hurdles faced in developing and commercializing biosimilars in the US and highlighting efforts by the organization to enhance access and affordability for these products.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.