Investigators said the English health care system has realized only a sliver of the potential savings potential from biosimilar insulin glargine and that uptake is widely uneven across health care centers.
A study of biosimilar insulin glargine uptake in England found huge missed savings over a 4-year period starting with the reference product’s loss of exclusivity in 2014.
The study, published in the current issue of Diabetes Care, said the savings generated from biosimilar use totaled just $1.1 million and the missed savings amounted to $32.1 million, “indicating that only 3.42% of the potential savings were achieved.”
Investigators also noted a large variation in uptake of insulin glargine biosimilars across Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), which serve to facilitate health care services between patients, physicians, and community groups.
Insulin glargine market shares between these groups ranged from 0% to 53.3% in December 2018, according to the study.
“These results may encourage decision makers in England to promote the use of best-value treatments in primary care and to reevaluate variation across CCGs,” authors of the study wrote.
To conduct the study, investigators collected information on all insulin glargine products prescribed by general practitioners up through December 2018. They then calculated total costs of insulin glargine and uptake rates of biosimilars.
They estimated what it would have cost to have filled all of the prescriptions with the reference product versus the actual cost of biosimilar and reference insulin glargine. The missed savings amount was based on what it would have cost to supply all of the patients with biosimilar forms of the drug.
Investigators described the study as the first to analyze adoption rates for insulin glargine biosimilars in the primary care environment in England and calculate the savings achieved and missed. The reference product that formed the basis for the study was Lantus.
Reference
Agirrezabal I, Sánchez-Iriso E, Mandar K, Cabasés JM. Real-world budget impact of the adoption of insulin glargine biosimilars in primary care in England (2015—2018). Diabetes Care. 2020;43(6):dc192395. doi:10.2337/dc19-2395
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
Cardinal Health Report Showcases Biosimilar Growth, Provider and Payer Evolution, and More
February 29th 2024In its annual biosimilars report, Cardinal Health provided updates on how provider acceptance growth, evolving payer dynamics, and the growing pipeline for biosimilars will shape the biosimilar landscape over the next 5 years.
Biosimilar Substitution Within OCM Could Result in Lower Total Cost of Care
February 16th 2024Researchers found that the total cost of care per oncology episode was significantly lowered when biosimilar substitution was implemented in Medicare’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), suggesting that biosimilar uptake can serve as a critical tool to mitigate risk and improve financial performance for providers.