In clinical practice, biologics are routinely used for medically accepted off-label indications, and these uses are typically curated by guidelines. A newly published study, led by Edward Li, PharmD, MPH, BCOP, argues that the FDA’s framework for granting the extrapolation of indications for biosimilars can be used by clinicians and payers to determine appropriate off-label uses of biosimilars.
In clinical practice, biologics are routinely used for medically accepted off-label indications, and these uses are typically curated by guidelines. A newly published study, led by Edward Li, PharmD, MPH, BCOP, argues that the FDA’s framework for granting the extrapolation of indications for biosimilars can be used by clinicians and payers to determine appropriate off-label uses of biosimilars.
The study’s authors conducted a literature review to gather and interpret data in the context of the FDA’s extrapolation framework to ascertain whether biosimilars could be used in off-label indications with scientific justification. Briefing documents—submitted by product developers to the FDA’s advisory committees—were reviewed to determine if differences in mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, immunogenicity, and toxicity across on-label indications would affect the evaluation of 2 biosimilars, infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra) and filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio) for the off-label indications of immune-mediated colitis and myelodysplastic syndromes, respectively.
Data collected, the authors reported, were intended to answer 2 questions. First, what are known to be the differences (if any) between the on-label indications and off-label indications for the reference product? Second, how does the totality of the evidence with the biosimilar affect the differences (if any) of the reference product?
In the case of reference infliximab, published case studies show that infliximab has been used successfully to treat severe immune-related colitis (an off-label use). There is no evidence to suggest that using biosimilar infliximab would produce different clinical result in patients with immune-mediated colitis based on the similar mechanism of action.
“The totality of the evidence with the biosimilar makes the case that infliximab-dyyb is an appropriate option in this setting,” wrote the authors.
In the case of filgrastim, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support the use of reference filgrastim in myelodysplastic syndromes. Because Zarxio is expected to stimulate the production of mature neutrophils to the same degree as the reference product, clinicians and payers may consider the use of Zarxio for symptomatic anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndromes to be scientifically justified.
The authors concluded that, in some cases, using biosimilars for off-label indications is scientifically justified.
“Coverage policy decisions are based on a review of the level of evidence supporting an indication, and decision makers recognize compendia and professional society guidelines in their evaluation of the evidence,” the authors added, and noted that it is incumbent upon compendia curators to conduct formal assessments of biosimilars’ off-label indications using the FDA’s framework for extrapolation.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Webinar Addresses Solutions to Improve Adalimumab Biosimilar Uptake
March 18th 2024Government policies, including those related to prescribing incentives and interchangeability, need to be reworked to encourage biosimilar adoption and create meaningful savings for health systems, according to speakers at a recent webinar.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for January 2024—Podcast Edition
February 4th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we reminisce on all the major gastroenterology news from January, which brought several reports quantifying how the gastroenterology biosimilar market is progressing and marked the 1-year anniversary of adalimumab biosimilar competition in the US.
Coherus Biosciences Cites Biosimilars as Main Drivers of 2023 Revenue Growth
March 14th 2024In its earnings report for the fourth quarter and full year of 2023, Coherus Biosciences detailed its rising revenue growth, which it partly attributed to increased sales for its pegfilgrastim and ranibizumab biosimilars.