At the GRx+Biosims conference, a fireside chat highlighted the need to streamline biosimilar development and strengthen industry collaboration, with Sarah Yim, MD, of the FDA, emphasizing education's key role in building trust and adoption.
During a fireside chat at the GRx+Biosims conference, Sarah Yim, MD, director of the FDA’s Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars (OTBB), stressed the need for stronger education efforts and industry collaboration to boost trust and streamline the path to biosimilar adoption.1
Moderated by Giuseppe Randazzo, senior vice president of sciences and regulatory affairs at the Association for Accessible Medicines, the discussion traced the path biosimilars have taken in the regulatory landscape and explored critical legislative and industry dynamics shaping the future of biosimilars. The GRx+Biosims conference is taking place October 21 to 23, 2024, in Rockville, Maryland.
Yim reflected on the initial uncertainty surrounding biosimilars when they first entered the market, acknowledging that understanding of these products has greatly evolved. She emphasized the industry's efforts to ensure that biosimilars closely resemble their reference products, both analytically and clinically. According to Yim, biosimilars show minimal differences from reference biologics, with no significant safety concerns, helping to build trust in their use among health care providers and patients.
The conversation moved to the legal and regulatory framework governing biosimilars, particularly the designation of interchangeability. Yim stressed the FDA’s commitment to adhering to the law while also considering potential reforms to streamline these standards. She discussed the proposal to remove the distinction between biosimilars and interchangeable products, explaining how a unified determination could simplify the regulatory process. This move, Yim noted, could help reduce barriers for biosimilar developers while maintaining patient safety and product efficacy.
On the subject of comparative efficacy studies, which many experts have called for the FDA to remove,2 Yim explained a disconnect within the agency between clinical and analytical data, pointing out that not all stakeholders have the same level of experience with biosimilars.
“I think what you're coming across is varying levels of experience and comfort [with biosimilars], right? There're a lot of folks who tend to be a little more conservative, and they want things to be clinical data driven. I think we're trying very hard to send out a message to everybody about how essential biosimilars are and how there's a public health need to streamline to reduce the burden of biosimilar development and get more of these products out to patients,” Yim explained.
Randazzo then asked about the potential reorganization of the OTBB into a more autonomous supervisory role. Yim discussed the benefits and challenges of such a change, emphasizing that efficiency would be key in ensuring faster and more cohesive regulatory reviews. Future reorganizations could further improve the agency’s capacity to handle biosimilar applications, Yim suggested.
Turning to global considerations, Yim addressed the hurdles in biosimilar development across multiple jurisdictions, where companies must conduct separate reference studies for each market. She noted the possibility of legislative changes to harmonize these requirements and highlighted the importance of maintaining scientific rigor while pursuing greater efficiency.
The FDA's international collaboration was also a focus of the chat, with Yim sharing progress made through partnerships with organizations like the World Health Organization and the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme. She stressed the importance of a global framework to identify when comparative efficacy studies are necessary, which could streamline biosimilar approval processes across borders.
In terms of public outreach and education, Yim underscored the FDA’s multifaceted approach, including continuing education for health care providers, updates to medical school curriculums, and efforts to engage the general public through social media and informational resources. Convincing health care providers to instill confidence in biosimilars with their patients is crucial, Yim added, as their support can significantly affect adoption rates.
Yim also emphasized the importance of collaboration between the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in identifying gaps in public policy and educational materials. She praised the industry’s role in advancing biosimilars through lobbying efforts and public policy initiatives, recognizing the potential for these partnerships to move legislative reforms forward.
As the fireside chat concluded, Yim reiterated the importance of collaboration and education in advancing the biosimilar market. Looking ahead, she highlighted ongoing efforts to streamline biosimilar development and foster greater understanding among both health care professionals and the public.
Randazzo and Yim will both be participating in this year's Global Biosimilars Week webinar, hosted by The Center for Biosimilars® and organized by the International Biosimilars and Generics Association. The webinar is being held on November 13, 2024 at 9:00am EST.
For more information on how to register, click here.
References
1. Randazzo G, Yim S. Biosimilars keynote address fireside chat. Presented at: GRx+Biosims; October 21-23, 2024; Rockville, Maryland.
2. Jeremais S. Part 2: FDA workshop shares manufacturer perspective on the value of clinical efficacy testing. September 18, 2023. Accessed October 22, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/part-2-fda-workshop-shares-manufacturer-perspective-on-the-value-of-clinical-efficacy-testing
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Aflibercept Biosimilar MYL-1701P Provides Equivalence in DME Therapy
November 27th 2024The study findings demonstrate that the aflibercept biosimilar MYL-1701P is as effective and safe as the reference aflibercept in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), offering a promising option for reducing treatment costs and improving global access to care for patients with DME.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Omalizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy as Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
November 26th 2024The phase 3 trial (NCT04966338) found that a biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) was equivalent to Ocrevus in reducing the annualized relapse rate and showed comparable safety and efficacy in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis over 96 weeks.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.