The FDA has issued new draft guidance on how biologic product sponsors should address postapproval changes in chemistry, manufacturing, and controls.
The FDA has issued new draft guidance on how biologic product sponsors should address postapproval changes in chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC).
The draft guidance, prepared by the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, provides recommendations to biologics license application (BLA) holders regarding the types of changes to an approved BLA that can be documented in annual reports. Under FDA regulation, postapproval CMC that have a minimal potential to affect product quality can be documented by BLA holders on a yearly basis, while changes that are considered major require applicants to submit and receive FDA approval of a supplement to the BLA before the affected product can be distributed. Moderate changes require a supplement to be submitted 30 days before product distribution.
The list of CMC changes to be submitted annually include:
If the FDA determines that a CMC change that falls into one of these categories would be more appropriately categorized as a major or moderate change and therefore require a supplement, the FDA will notify the applicant and request further information.
Changes documented in annual reporting should include full descriptions, with details concerning the manufacturing sites involved, the date of the change, a cross-reference relevant to validation protocols or standard operating procedures, relevant data from studies and tests performed to assess the effect of the change on product quality, a list of products involved, and a statement that the effects of the change have been assessed.
The FDA notes that it has produced the new guidance after having observed a steady increase in the number of CMC manufacturing supplements that it has received. An annual submission of CMC changes that have a minimal potential to harm product quality could allow the agency to streamline its processes, in keeping with its current focus on efficiency and the better use of limited resources.
The FDA will accept comments on the draft guidance on docket FDA-2017-D-2802 until October 10, 2017.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.