Corticosteroids are often given as therapy for neurosarcoidosis, but there remains a need for more effective treatment, and infliximab is increasingly used in this context.
Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of undetermined etiology that results in the formation of granulomas. In neurosarcoidosis, a potentially life-threatening manifestation of sarcoidosis that accounts for up to 15% of cases of sarcoidosis, the central and peripheral nervous system may be affected, leading to symptoms such as seizures, meningitis, or optical nerve involvement.1 Corticosteroids are often given as therapy for neurosarcoidosis, but there remains a need for more effective treatment, and infliximab is increasingly used in this context.
Biosimilar Infliximab in Neurosarcoidosis
A recent study, published in the Journal of Neurology, reported on a retrospective study, conducted at a single center in France, that investigated the safety and efficacy of biosimilar infliximab in treating patients with neurosarcoidosis.2
In total, 20 patients with histologically documented neurosarcoidosis were treated with an infliximab biosimilar, with 12 patients starting treatment with the biosimilar and 8 switching from the reference infliximab. In total, 18 patients received corticosteroids together with infliximab, and 16 received either methotrexate or azathioprine together with infliximab.
The investigators found that, in a follow-up period with a median duration of 25 months (range, 19-28), 6 patients experienced a relapse. The relapse rates and time to relapse did not differ between the patients who started with the biosimilar versus those who switched treatment. In total, 9 patients experienced 11 adverse events (AEs) while treated with the biosimilar. These included 5 infections, 4 cases of urticaria, and 1 case each of headache and diarrhea. All of the AEs were of grade 2 or less.
Treating neurosarcoidosis with biosimilar infliximab, say the authors, was both safe and efficacious.
Neurosarcoidosis as an Immune Checkpoint—Related AE
Having infliximab and its biosimilars available as treatment options for patients with neurosarcoidosis may prove to be helpful as more patients with cancer undergo immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy that can lead to immune-related AEs that include neurosarcoidosis.
As a recent case study in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer reported, neurosarcoidosis may appear up to 1 year after discontinuation of immune checkpoint therapy.3 The case study describes a patient who received ipilimumab and nivolumab for recurrent metastatic melanoma and developed systemic sarcoidosis shortly after starting treatment. Immune checkpoint therapy was discontinued, and approximately 1 year later, the patient was found to have neurosarcoidosis.
The patient received treatment with steroids, infliximab, and later methotrexate, and achieved clinical and radiographic improvement within 4 months.
Potential Complications with Infliximab Therapy for Neurosarcoidosis
The effectiveness of infliximab in treating neurosarcoidosis notwithstanding, the biologic is not without challenges. Chronic immunosuppression can cause patients to become susceptible to opportunistic infections, and another recent case study highlights the potential for fatal complications with infliximab therapy.
The study’s authors report the case of a patient with neurosarcoidosis who was treated with infliximab and dexamethasone who presented with progressive cognitive decline. A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the brain showed ring-enhancing lesions, and infection was suspected.4
The care team held immunosuppression and treated the patient with empiric antifungal therapy, but the patient’s neurological and respiratory condition deteriorated rapidly, and the patient died from respiratory failure. An autopsy revealed the presence of invasive aspergillosis.
The report’s authors highlight the fact that treatment with infliximab can have serious complications, including difficult-to-identify and difficult-to-treat invasive aspergillosis. More studies, they write, will be needed to identify the risks associated with infliximab in patients with neurosarcoidosis in order to improve patient outcomes.
References
1. Blume C, Tuleta I, Nolte K, et al. Neurosarcoidosis as a rare differential diagnosis for single or multiple lesions of the nervous system. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;8:1-5. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1506094.
2. Riller Q, Cotteret C, Junot H, et al. Infliximab biosimilar for treating neurosarcoidosis: tolerance and efficacy in a retrospective study including switch from the originator and initiation of treatment [published online February 9, 2019]. J Neurol. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09234-y.
3. Tan I, Malinzak M, Salama AKS. Delayed onset of neurosarcoidosis after concurrent ipilimumab/nivolumab therapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0390-2.
4. Van Sanford C, Obeidat AZ, Hagen M, Zabeti A. A case of fatal invasive aspergillosis in a patient with neurosarcoidosis treated with infliximab [published online November 15, 2018].
Int J Neurosci. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1544130.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
Cardinal Health Report Showcases Biosimilar Growth, Provider and Payer Evolution, and More
February 29th 2024In its annual biosimilars report, Cardinal Health provided updates on how provider acceptance growth, evolving payer dynamics, and the growing pipeline for biosimilars will shape the biosimilar landscape over the next 5 years.
Biosimilar Substitution Within OCM Could Result in Lower Total Cost of Care
February 16th 2024Researchers found that the total cost of care per oncology episode was significantly lowered when biosimilar substitution was implemented in Medicare’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), suggesting that biosimilar uptake can serve as a critical tool to mitigate risk and improve financial performance for providers.