Coherus BioSciences announced that it has been issued a complete response letter by the FDA in response to its biologics license application for CHS-1701, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar candidate.
Coherus BioSciences announced yesterday that it has been issued a complete response letter by the FDA in response to its biologics license application for CHS-1701, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar candidate referenced on Amgen’s Neulasta, a product that Coherus called the largest-selling oncology biologic in the United States.
In its letter, the agency asked Coherus to perform a reanalysis of a subset of samples with a revised immunogenicity assay and to provide additional manufacturing-related process information. The FDA did not request a clinical study of CHS-1701 in oncology patients, however, and did not indicate that additional process qualification lots would be necessary.
Coherus says that it will work with the agency to address its outstanding concerns. President and CEO of Coherus BioSciences, Denny Lanfear, said, “While we are disappointed in the delay that this additional request has caused, we remain confident in our ability to address the FDA’s request for the purpose of obtaining approval for CHS-1701. We are encouraged that a patient study has not been requested and we expect that we will be able to respond to the FDA and meet with them to define a path forward in the coming months…we anticipate that CHS-1701’s approval will generate significant US healthcare savings while increasing patient access.”
Investors in Coherus may feel less confident than Lanfear, however; after news of the FDA’s letter broke, the company’s stock prices dropped by 27.2% in Monday’s midday trading.
News of this latest biosimilar setback comes just 5 months after Sandoz withdrew its pegfilgrastim product from consideration by the European Medicines Agency after being issued a list of questions by the agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Sandoz had previously received its own complete response letter from the FDA for the same product.
In the coming months, all industry eyes will be on Mylan and Biocon’s attempt at a pegfilgrastim biosimilar, MYL-1401H. The FDA accepted a Biologics License Application from Mylan in February, and the agency’s goal date set under the Biosimilar User Fee Act is October 9 of this year.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.