On Tuesday, leaders of patient advocacy groups presenting at the 2017 AAM Biosimilars Council Conference had a clear message for industry: biosimilar uptake will only happen in earnest when patients begin to see savings on their out-of-pocket treatment costs.
On Tuesday, leaders of patient advocacy groups presenting at the 2017 AAM Biosimilars Council Conference had a clear message for industry: biosimilar uptake will only happen in earnest when patients begin to see savings on their out-of-pocket treatment costs.
In a panel moderated by Edward Li, PharmD, MPH, BCOP, patient advocates Michele McCourt, senior director of the CancerCare Co-Payment Assistance Foundation; Claire Saxton, MBA, senior director of education for the Cancer Support Community; Laura Wingate, senior vice president of education, support, and advocacy of the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation; and Christy Gamble, JD, DrPH, MPH, director of health policy and legislative affairs for the Black Women’s Health Imperative, spoke on the patient perspective on biosimilars.
McCourt highlighted the serious impacts of the high cost of care on patients, explaining that she has spoken to paitents who are “doing a lot to stretch their medication” in order to save on costs. Those patients do not achieve their desired or expected outcomes because they are not taking medications as prescribed. “We all know that cancer is an expensive illness…biosimilars coming into the market will reduce overall costs, and we’re hopeful that the reduction in cost to the payers will eventually make their way down to the patient level.” If patients are able to afford to take their drugs as prescribed, McCourt said, they will achieve better outcomes.
According to Gamble, such problems of affordability are even more prominent among communities that already face barriers to access. “We’re recognizing, historically, people of color face significant barriers” to healthcare, Gamble said. “Unfortunately, when biologics came to market they were extremely expensive, insurance companies were refusing to cover these therapies or [requiring patients to pay] out-of-pocket. Patients of color make up a disproportionate number of individuals [who have] lower-incomes,” and they are “resorting to older, outdated treatments with more side effects.” Because of the problem of affordability, Gamble said, “It’s been very difficult to try to get patients of color to look to biologics.” For Gamble, it is critical that the industry recognize that “availability and access are not synonymous.”
Wingate concurred that patients are eager for more affordable biologic therapy: “You’re going to see a greater uptake of biosimilars when the cost savings are passed down to the patient. When those costs reach the patient, you’re going to see a big change in the environment in the [United States].”
When asked by Li whether patients might see an incentive to switch to biosimilars if such a change could eventually lower health insurance premiums overall, Wingate said, “It depends on the patient and where they are.” While patients with the means to pay for their drugs might find such an argument convincing, “If you’re talking to someone who can’t afford their medications,” immediate savings will be the patient’s primary concern. McCourt agreed, saying, “If the patient is stressing over their finances, the overall out-of-pocket is definitely going to be the consideration.”
Patients also need access to better, audience-specific educational materials on biosimilars, the advocates said, in order to feel confident about switching their treatments. According to Wingate, “patients are drivers of change…[Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation focuses on] giving patients the tools to be well educated and making sure the tools are available for all different learning styles. Once they’re educated and they’re seeing the cost savings, that’s when you’re going to get [biosimilar] uptake.”
Saxton agreed with a need for more patient educatoin, saying that an informal poll conducted by Cancer Support Community found that only 18% of respondents knew what a biologic treatment was, “let alone a biosimilar.” For Saxton, “the big push is to get people to recognize what a biosimilar is, and get across the message about safety and efficacy.”
Finally, the advocates called upon the industry to partner with them to learn what is most important to patients, and to develop strategies to deliver cost-saving treatments to the patients who want and need them.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
The 6 Key Policy Factors to Ensure Biosimilar Market Sustainability
April 16th 2024Magnus Bodin, senior director and head of international access and policy at Biogen, presented warning signs for unsustainable biosimilar markets as well as key factors needed to create effective policies and future-proof biosimilar markets globally.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for January 2024—Podcast Edition
February 4th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we reminisce on all the major gastroenterology news from January, which brought several reports quantifying how the gastroenterology biosimilar market is progressing and marked the 1-year anniversary of adalimumab biosimilar competition in the US.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.