The current administration in Washington, DC, is one of the most active when it comes to policy and regulation that affects biosimilars, said a presenter who recapped recent changes for the attendees at the 14th Biosimilars Summit, held January 22-23, 2019, in Alexandria, Virginia.
The current administration in Washington, DC, is one of the most active when it comes to policy and regulation that affects biosimilars, said a presenter at the 14th Biosimilars Summit, held January 22-23, 2019, in Alexandria, Virginia.
Molly Burich, MS, director of public policy for biosimilars and reimbursement for Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, recapped last year’s changes to reimbursement for biosimiliars by CMS in Part B, which is how the government pays for drugs administered by physicians. As with other presentations at the conference, not every rule or regulation is specific to biosimiliars, but almost everything has an impact, she said.
“CMS does drive a good bit of the decision-making,” said Burich. “Commercial payers often follow.”
Burich discussed the changes in the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS). Last year, CMS began reimbursing biosimilars through Medicare Part B with its own codes (known as Q codes) as opposed to lumping them together with the same billing code (J) as reference biologics.
Q codes are historically considered temporary codes; it is up to CMS to decide when to move a biosimilar to the permanent J code, she said. While Q codes are considered temporary, Burich said the good thing is that most payers are using them.
This is an improvement from a few years ago, when CMS was assigning biosimilars “blended” codes, which Burich said most stakeholders did not want, given issues with pricing and tracking pharmacovigilance. By removing blended codes, biosimilars no longer need a separate modifier for billing purposes; that issue alone caused some complications in trying to educate physicians and coding staff about how to use them, she said.
With the separate coding system, Part B now pays for biosimilars under the Physician Fee Schedule based on the average sales price (ASP) plus 6% of its specific reference product. Previously, CMS treated biosimlar reimbursement similarly to how it treats small-molecule drugs and generics and did not differentiate between them.
“That really did create payment uncertainty and instability for physicians," she said.
Another change from last year, albeit one that is on hold due to a federal court decision in late December 2018, are 340B price cuts. If their sponsors apply for pass-through status, which lasts for 3 years, biosimilars are exempt from the cuts that HHS tried to make last year. HHS sought to reduce the price paid to ASP minus 22.5%, but the court ruled that HHS did not have the authority to make the decision.
Burich also discussed step therapy in Medicare Advantage plans as another opportunity for biosimilars, but acknowledged that, “Different stakeholders have different perspectives.” She noted that the CMS plan has certain guardrails in place, and that decisions to move from a reference product to a biosimilar should not be made unless it is clinically appropriate.
AON Saves Over $243 Million With High Biosimilar Adoption
April 22nd 2024Thanks to high biosimilar adoption rates within the community oncology setting, American Oncology Network saved upwards of $243 million between 2020 and 2023, according to a presentation at the Festival of Biologics USA conference in San Diego, California.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
The 6 Key Policy Factors to Ensure Biosimilar Market Sustainability
April 16th 2024Magnus Bodin, senior director and head of international access and policy at Biogen, presented warning signs for unsustainable biosimilar markets as well as key factors needed to create effective policies and future-proof biosimilar markets globally.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.
Rising Biosimilar Adoption for an Italian Payer Will Benefit National Health Care System, Patients
April 9th 2024Data from 2021 and 2022 indicates increasing biosimilar use in an Italian health care company, with potential for full adoption in the future, benefiting both the National Health System and citizens through efficient and sustainable health care policies.