During the second day of the 37th Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference, held January 7-10 in San Francisco, California, Dennis M. Lanfear, president and CEO of Coherus BioSciences, presented an overview of what he called his company’s “branded approach” to selling its newly launched biosimilar pegfilgrastim, Udenyca.
During the second day of the 37th Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference, held January 7-10 in San Francisco, California, Dennis M. Lanfear, president and CEO of Coherus BioSciences, presented an overview of what he called his company’s “branded approach” to selling its newly launched biosimilar pegfilgrastim, Udenyca.
First, said Lanfear, to help support the January 3 launch of the biosimilar, the company has entered into a $75 million secured credit agreement with Healthcare Royalty Partners. This infusion of capital, he said, strengthens the company’s balance sheet, but Coherus will continue to take the “firm hand” with its cashflow that it first employed when the pegfilgrastim biosimilar was subject to a Complete Response Letter in 2017 (prior to eventual approval in 2018).
The newly raised funds will help Coherus in its ambitious launch program for Udenyca, which Lanfear emphasized is not similar to a generic launch. “Our approach is that of a branded launch…this has never been done before with a biosimilar,” he said, and revealed an image of Udenyca’s tagline, “The neu thing,” a reference to the brand-name pegfilgrastim, Neulasta, that he said has been well received by the biosimilar’s customer base.
Crucial to Coherus’ strategy is its substantial discount to its reference. Lanfear explained that Amgen’s wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for Neulasta is $6231, but its average sales price (ASP) is $4422. Udenyca’s WAC of $4175 was an attempt to “avoid the errors of other biosimilar launches who came out with a WAC that was higher than the ASP of the originator” because payers have proven to be unwilling to pay more for a biosimilar. “Our team has focused on all the biosimilar launches previously and what has gone sideways with those” to avoid repeating such mistakes, he said.
The company’s approach, he explained, focuses on payers, integrated delivery networks, and group purchasing organizations that consolidate purchasing for clinics and hospitals, as well as provider segments comprising community oncology clinics, 340B hospitals, and non-340B hospitals.
“Out of the gate, you have to have the payers lined up,” said Lanfear, noting that the company had “inked a deal last week” with Anthem. He also noted that Aetna now requires all patients to start with either Udenyca or Mylan and Biocon’s pegfilgrastim biosimilar, Fulphila, before stepping through to the higher-cost originator. “It’s not something we asked them to do, but we’re pleased to see it.”
Among provider segments, Lanfear said, cost recovery is expected to drive the market for the biosimilar, “particularly in some of the hospital segments…which are underwater and lose when they inject Neulasta.” With non-340B hospitals in mind, he said, for biosimilars with pass-through status, which Udenyca is expected to have by April of this year, reimbursement will be the biosimilar’s ASP plus 6% of the reference product’s ASP for at least 2 years, providing a significant competitive opportunity.
Looking to the future and the remainder of its biosimilar pipeline, Coherus will continue to use what Lanfear called an innovative approach to development of its products. He noted the fact that Udenyca was the first biosimilar to receive FDA approval without data from a phase 3 confirmatory trial, and he said that the company was exerting a great deal of effort on its ranibizumab and aflibercept molecules in the preclinical stage.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Addressing Patent Abuse, Reimbursement Models Key to Sustainable Biosimilar Market
April 25th 2025Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, emphasized strategies to streamline regulations and evolve to overcome barriers and expand the availability of cost-effective biosimilar treatments across more therapeutic areas.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Decade of Biosimilars Yields $36 Billion in Savings and Strengthens Supply Chain
April 24th 2025Dracey Poore, MS, director of biosimilars and emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, highlighted that biosimilars saved $36 billion over the last decade by improving patient access and the supply chain, but continued education and a robust pipeline are crucial for future growth.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.