According to the report, Medicare Part D drugs that demonstrated the lowest annual cost increases offered higher average rebates than drugs with the highest annual cost increases.
While the Trump administration is considering a proposal from HHS to overhaul safe harbor protections for rebates given by drug makers to health plans and pharmacy benefit managers as a way to bring down high drug prices, a new report prepared for America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) suggests that much-maligned rebates are not to blame for increases in drug prices.
AHIP engaged consulting company Milliman to examine Medicare Part D drug prices and manufacturer rebates to help the organization prepare its comments in response to the administration’s blueprint to lower the price of drugs for American patients. Milliman used publicly available Part D drug spending and utilization data from 2013 to 2016, combined with 2016 data from contributing health plans on rebates.
According to the report, rebates are typically offered only for brand-name drugs; 81% of all of the Part D drugs analyzed offered no rebates. Furthermore, 64% of brand-name drugs did not offer rebates, and non-specialty drugs—rather than pricier specialty products—had the highest rebates when measured as a percentage of gross drug costs.
Of the 706 branded products analyzed, representing 95% of brand drug spending, only 36% had more than a nominal manufacturer rebate (rebates representing more than 1% of the drug’s gross cost), and only 27% offered significant rebates (representing 12% or more of the drug’s gross cost).
Products that face direct brand competition had a higher proportion of drugs that offered rebates (as well as a higher average rebate as a percentage of gross costs), while those in protected classes had the lowest proportion of rebates (and the lowest average rebate as a percentage of gross costs). Those products that faced direct competition offered rebates that totaled approximately 39% of gross costs, while products that were in protected classes offered rebates that totaled just 14% of the same.
Notably, while drugs with rebates offered in 2016 had higher price trends than did drugs without rebates, the average annual gross cost per Medicare beneficiary has increased more quickly for drugs that offered no rebates. Products that demonstrated the lowest annual cost increases offered higher average rebates than drugs with the highest annual cost increases.
The report’s findings suggest that addressing rebates alone will not reduce drug prices; while Milliman and AHIP’s report did not offer direct proposals as to how to address the problem of high drug prices outside of targeting rebates, competition, the findings suggest, may be the key.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.