The international initiative AllTrials has launched a new online tracking tool that publicly discloses which research entities have not reported data from clinical trials.
The international initiative AllTrials has launched a new online tracking tool that publicly discloses which research entities have not reported data from clinical trials.
AllTrials, founded in 2013, with institutional members including BMJ, PLOS, and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, among others, calls for all past and present clinical trials to be registered, and for the results of these trials to be reported in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the World Medical Association’s statement of principles for medical research involving people.
The tool, the FDAA TrialsTracker, lists all clinical trials by sponsor name, itemizes ongoing trials, and highlights any trials that are overdue for reporting their results. Additionally, the tracker notes the number of days that results are past due, and how many dollars the FDA could impose in fines for the failure to report results.
AllTrials announced the new initiative in an open letter to FDA Commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, MD, in which the group noted that FDA has “…the power to sanction those who break this law, including the levy of fines up to $10,000 a day against clinical trial sponsors who fail to publish their trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov,” based on the fact that the FDA is the body responsible for compliance with the FDA Amendments Act of 2007. Under the law, the FDA can sanction those who do not post summary results and adverse event information within 13 months of trial completion.
“We know that the FDA takes patient safety seriously and we are sure that you will follow the tracker to act on unreported trials,” said the group’s open letter. “However, to assist you further we will also write weekly with the list of trials that have breached their reporting requirements and a rolling total of the fines that these should incur,” say the authors.
The launch of the tracker comes on the heels of a 2017 publication in BMJ of a study, led by AllTrials members, that assessed the clinical trial reporting policies of 42 companies in the European Union, United States, Japan, and Canada. The researchers found that company policies on reporting varied widely, often had unclear language, and exhibited internal contradictions. “Many companies lacked commitments on basic issues such as trial registration and the sharing of summary results,” said the authors, adding that “Transparency commitments generally did not include trials for off-label uses, even though these are common in clinical practice; and commonly failed to include phase [4] trials.”
Reference
Goldacre B, Lane S, Mahtani K, et al. Pharmaceutical companies’ policies on access to trial data, results, and methods: audit study. Published July 26, 2017. BMJ. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3334.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
The 6 Key Policy Factors to Ensure Biosimilar Market Sustainability
April 16th 2024Magnus Bodin, senior director and head of international access and policy at Biogen, presented warning signs for unsustainable biosimilar markets as well as key factors needed to create effective policies and future-proof biosimilar markets globally.
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.