On Monday, March 26, a Delaware court judge granted Coherus Biosciences’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Amgen over alleged infringement of a patent covering pegfilgrastim (Neulasta).
On Monday, March 26, a Delaware court judge granted Coherus Biosciences’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Amgen over alleged infringement of a patent covering pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted.
The patent in question, US patent 8,273,707, is directed to a process for purifying proteins during which 2 specific salts are used in a loading solution, and Amgen claimed that Coherus infringed on the patent when it submitted an abbreviated Biologics License Application (aBLA) for its as-yet unapproved pegfilgrastim biosimilar, CHS-1701.
According to the court, Amgen previously acknowledged that Coherus did not “literally infringe” on the patent, although Coherus’ preparation process mixed salts that, in combinations, were equivalent to Amgen’s patented combinations.
Amgen argued that dismissal of the case was premature because there remained factual disputes, but according to the court, “the facts in the prosecution history here are undisputed,” and Amgen “merely disputes the interpretation of those facts.”
Amgen initially filed the suit after the parties completed the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act “patent dance,” and agreed that the patent would be subject to an immediate infringement action. Amgen argued that it did not have an adequate remedy at law, and that it was entitled to injunctive relief to prevent Coherus from any further infringement of its patent.
Dismissal of the suit is a step forward for Coherus, which announced earlier this month that it is close to resubmitting its aBLA for the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar. It hopes to launch the biosimilar by mid-2018.
In June of last year, the company received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA, in which the agency asked Coherus to perform a reanalysis of a subset of samples with a revised immunogenicity assay and to provide additional manufacturing-related process information. The FDA did not request a clinical study of CHS-1701 in oncology patients, however, and did not indicate that additional process qualification lots would be necessary. Coherus says that it also hopes to receive approval for the drug from the European Medicines Agency in the second half of this year.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
British Columbia’s Biosimilar Policy Shows No Impact on Hospital Visits
May 28th 2025Despite a dramatic shift toward biosimilar use following British Columbia’s policy, researchers found no rise in hospital visits or complications, underscoring the real-world reliability of etanercept biosimilars in managing inflammatory arthritis.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.