In an effort to speed more generic drug approvals, the FDA said it is changing how it assigns priority review status to abbreviated new drug applications.
The FDA released another set of changes this week, this time changing how abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) are prioritized for review so that the agency’s resources are allocated to generic drugs that would have the biggest impact on public health.
Before, “roughly half of all ANDA submissions were designated as priority submissions, including many products that could not be marketed for several years as a result of blocking patents or exclusivities,” according to Sally Choe, PhD, director of the Office of Generic Drugs in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Under the previous version of the Manual of Policies and Procedures (MAPP) 5240.3, Prioritization of the Review of Original ANDAs, Amendments, and Supplements, the FDA prioritized submissions from first filers and from applicants with paragraph IV certifications, even though the drugs would not be able to come to market for years due to a patent, 30-month stay, or exclusivity blocking final approval. A paragraph IV certification is a generic applicant’s assertion that the brand-name product’s patents listed in the Orange Book are invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the proposed generic product.
This did not improve generic drug access, the FDA said; wider access could have the effect of “potentially lowering costs by expediting the availability of safe, high-quality, effective generic medicines in areas of the market with limited competition,” said Choe.
Under the change, an original ANDA must meet certain criteria in order to have a priority review. Those include:
Among other things, prioritization factors include:
The change applies to both regular generic drugs as well as complex generics, which generally mean drugs with complex active ingredients, complex formulations, complex routes of delivery, or complex dosage forms.
Separately, the House Energy and Commerce Committee made a bipartisan request earlier this month to FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, asking for additional information about the approval process for complex generic drugs. According to the letter, the representatives want information about whether the agency’s “initiatives and commitments are sufficient to address the particular challenge of approving complex generic drugs” and to find out if “additional authority is needed to improve the approval process for complex generic drugs to increase access and reduce costs.”
Among other things, the committee asked for a list of list of all complex generic drugs approved by FDA since October 1, 2016, including the date of the first submission, the dates of other milestones and the date of approval, and the number of pre-ANDA meeting requests that FDA has received each year since the program was launched, the number of pre-ANDA meetings that FDA has held each year, and. the number of ANDAs that have been submitted for products discussed during these meetings.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Webinar Addresses Solutions to Improve Adalimumab Biosimilar Uptake
March 18th 2024Government policies, including those related to prescribing incentives and interchangeability, need to be reworked to encourage biosimilar adoption and create meaningful savings for health systems, according to speakers at a recent webinar.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
BioRationality: EMA Announces Readiness to Waive Comparative Efficacy Studies of Biosimilars
March 4th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, takes a look at the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) announcement that it will investigate whether comparative efficacy tests should be needed for a biosimilar to receive regulatory approval.