The FDA this week announced revised draft guidance that it says will help ensure that citizen petitions cannot be used by brand-name drug makers to delay the market entry of generics or biosimilars of branded products.
The FDA this week announced revised draft guidance that it says will help ensure that citizen petitions cannot be used by brand-name drug makers to delay the market entry of generics or biosimilars of branded products.
Citizen petitions allow any interested party to ask the FDA Commissioner to amend agency regulations or to take (or refrain from taking) an administrative action. The FDA is required to respond to such petitions within 150 days of filing.
While the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, enacted in 2012, holds that approval of a pending drug application must not be delayed because of a request for action unless the written request convinces the FDA that a delay is necessary to protect the public health, citizen petitions have been the subject of controversy. During the FDA’s 2017 meeting on administering the Hatch-Waxman amendments, numerous stakeholders raised the question of whether citizen petitions filed by brand-name drug makers could be used to forestall competition.
Learn more about citizen petitions.
In a statement announcing the new guidance, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, noted that, “While the record shows that citizen petitions have rarely delayed specific generic drug approvals, there’s no doubt that the process requirements associated with [citizen petitions] can add to resource burdens on the generic drug review process and the FDA’s regulatory decision making.”
The new guidance, Gottlieb explained, will help to improve the agency’s review process efficiency as a way to discourage companies from improperly filing petitions.
A key feature of the guidance is FDA’s stated intention to refer to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) any petitions that have been submitted with an apparent intention to thwart competition. That announcement comes after the FDA signaled its intention to work more closely with the FTC earlier this year.
The guidance indicates that the FDA may determine that a petition was submitted with the primary purpose of delaying an application’s approval based on a number of criteria, including, among others:
In addition to sending such petitions to the FTC for further scrutiny, says the FDA, the agency will highlight such petitions in its annual report to Congress.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: MHRA's Procedure Enables Automatic Registration of Biosimilars Approved Elsewhere
March 18th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains how the new international recognition procedure under the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) could expand biosimilar access within the United Kingdom, in his latest column.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Coherus Biosciences Cites Biosimilars as Main Drivers of 2023 Revenue Growth
March 14th 2024In its earnings report for the fourth quarter and full year of 2023, Coherus Biosciences detailed its rising revenue growth, which it partly attributed to increased sales for its pegfilgrastim and ranibizumab biosimilars.
Filgrastim Biosimilars in Europe: 15 Years of Real-World Evidence for Zarxio
March 13th 2024A review looking back at the last 15 years of experience with the first filgrastim biosimilar (Zarxio) provides a detailed overview on how filgrastim biosimilars came to be and the evidence behind why oncologists have come to accept them as standard practice.