China-based biosimilar developer Innovent and Eli Lilly and Company announced this week that 2 studies of IBI301, a proposed rituximab biosimilar being jointly developed by the 2 drug makers, met their primary end points.
China-based biosimilar developer Innovent and Eli Lilly and Company announced this week that 2 studies of IBI301, a proposed rituximab biosimilar being jointly developed by the 2 drug makers, met their primary end points.
The first study, a randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive-controlled, single-dose study, assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar versus the reference drug in 181 patients with CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma. Innovent and Lilly say that the PK study met its primary end point, area under the concentration—time curve from time zero to infinity, of the biosimilar versus the reference over a time frame of 91 days.
The second study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive-controlled phase 3 trial that enrolled 420 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received either the biosimilar or the reference drug in combination with standard chemotherapy for 6 cycles as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed disease. The drug makers indicated that the trial met its primary end point of overall response rate over a time frame of 18 weeks.
“Malignant lymphoma is one of the top 10 malignancies in China, and incidences thereof are still rising and
pose
a heavy economic burden for the vast majority of patients. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are effective treatments for lymphoma. However, currently there is only 1 approved biosimilar in China,” said Michael Yu, founder, chairman, and chief executive officer of Innovent, in a statement announcing the topline results. “The results of clinical studies of IBI301, a potential biosimilar of rituximab, are encouraging. We hope that the launch of IBI301 in the China market will improve its affordability, so more patients with lymphoma can benefit from the drug,” he added.
Wang Li, senior vice president of Lilly China and head of Lilly China drug development and medical affairs, added, “The results of these studies have significant clinical value and show the outstanding research and development capabilities of Innovent. We hope that IBI301 can be approved soon in order to offer an affordable treatment option for lymphoma patients in China.”
These positive results are the latest in a line of biosimilar news for Innovent; the company in late 2018 applied for Chinese regulatory approval of its proposed adalimumab biosimilar, which was studied in a phase 3 clinical trial in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Also in 2018, the company filed for Chinese approval of its proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, which was studied in patients with advanced nonsquamous non—small-cell lung cancer.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.