No statistically significant risk in terms of lack of effectiveness or safety was found for patients who switched therapies versus those who remained on their first therapy in either the reference group or the biosimilar group.
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) play a crucial role in treating chronic kidney disease (CKD), and biosimilars, which have been available for more than a decade, have a major presence in Italy, where they account for approximately 51% of all ESAs used. Switching among ESAs is also relatively common in Italy, and a large-scale Italian observational study published last week reported that switching among ESAs in patients with CKD was not associated with impacts to efficacy or safety.
In the study, the researchers used multiple databases in 4 Italian geographical areas, and they assessed all 14,400 individuals with CKD who initiated treatment with ESAs between 2009 and 2015. Switching was defined as any transition between a reference ESA (Eprex), a biosimilar ESA (Abseamed, Binocrit, Retacrit), or any other ESA (such as short-acting epoetins like Neorecormon or long-acting epoetins like Aranesp, Nespo, or Mircera) for at least 2 prescriptions.
The researchers matched switched patients to nonswitched patients and followed them for up to 1 year after the switch date. Outcomes of interest were effectiveness and safety of ESAs; blood transfusions or anemia were considered indicative of lack of effectiveness, and major cardiovascular events, dyscrasias, and hypersensitivity were considered indicative of safety issues.
In total, 8843 (61.4%) patients started treatment with the reference product, while 5557 (38.6%) received a biosimilar. In the 2 groups, the percentages of patients who switched to another agent within 2 years were 21.1% and 11.5%, respectively.
In the reference group, most switches were to long-acting agents (58.5%), while 14.2% switched to a biosimilar. In the biosimilar group, most switches were to the reference (43.1%).
Overall, the investigators say lack of efficacy or safety issues occurred in 7.7% and 4.5%, respectively, of patients in the reference group. In the biosimilar group, the corresponding percentages of patients were 7.8% and 4.0%.
No statistically significant risk in terms of lack of effectiveness or safety was found for patients who switched therapies versus those who remained on their first therapy in either the reference group or the biosimilar group.
According to the authors, while the European Medicines Agency does not regulate interchangeability of biosimilars and reference products, Italy has taken the position that biosimilars and their references can be treated as interchangeable by prescribers, and this study has demonstrated that switching among ESA products is effective and safe in comparison with continued treatment with a single product.
“These results may be very useful to support clinical decisions related to switching drug therapies and promote better health policies to improve the uptake of biosimilars in the population,” they write.
Reference
Belleudi V, Trotta F, Addis A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of switching originator and biosimilar epoetins in patients with chronic kidney disease in a large-scale Italian cohort study [published online June 21, 2019]. Drug Saf. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00845-y.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
Cardinal Health Report Showcases Biosimilar Growth, Provider and Payer Evolution, and More
February 29th 2024In its annual biosimilars report, Cardinal Health provided updates on how provider acceptance growth, evolving payer dynamics, and the growing pipeline for biosimilars will shape the biosimilar landscape over the next 5 years.
Biosimilar Substitution Within OCM Could Result in Lower Total Cost of Care
February 16th 2024Researchers found that the total cost of care per oncology episode was significantly lowered when biosimilar substitution was implemented in Medicare’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), suggesting that biosimilar uptake can serve as a critical tool to mitigate risk and improve financial performance for providers.