In a research letter appearing this week in JAMA Internal Medicine, authors from Oregon Health and Science University raised the question of whether the “large and increasing revenue from eculizumab” could be tied to off-label use for non-approved indications.
Since its initial approval by the FDA in 2007, eculizumab (Soliris) has gathered a total of 4 indications, and it brought in sales of $3.5 billion in 2018. One of the most expensive drugs in the world, the C5 complement inhibitor targeted by multiple biosimilar development projects has long raised concerns about cost.
In a research letter appearing this week in JAMA Internal Medicine, authors from Oregon Health and Science University raised the question of whether the “large and increasing revenue from eculizumab” could be tied to off-label use for non-approved indications.
Using ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and PubMed, the authors identified studies of eculizumab, and reviewed all articles published before February of this year.
They found that there were 372 publications, which included just 22 published clinical trials and 39 observational studies. The remaining 311 publications were case reports or case series. Most of the clinical trials (77%) included fewer than 50 patients.
Publications reported on studies in 39 different indications, including hematological disorders, autoimmune disorders, transplant-related indications, and renal disorders.
Publications for just 2 of the FDA-approved indications, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and myasthenia gravis, were available, and 27 of the 39 indications studied had no randomized clinical trials published.
The authors of the letter write that, in other drugs, prior research has demonstrated that exploratory postapproval trials for unapproved indications have led to widespread use of products in indications where they have not been proven to be effective.
According to the authors, more research is warranted to determine what proportion of revenue related to eculizumab is from off-label versus on-label use, and “patients and clinicians should be aware that the evidence supporting off- label use consists mostly of case series/case reports, along with small observational and interventional studies.”
Reference
Kim MS, Prasad V. The clinical trials portfolio for on-label and off-label studies of eculizumab [published online October 28, 2019]. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4694.
What Clinicians Need to Know About Using Biosimilars to Treat IBD
April 13th 2024A review article, intended to act as a guide for clinicians, summarizes the available infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as others that are coming down the pipeline.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Biosimilar Business Roundup for October 2023—Podcast Edition
November 5th 2023On this episode, we discuss the biggest news to come out of October 2023, including 3 regulatory approvals, 2 complete response letters, and new data and industry insights that have the potential to impact the entire US biosimilar industry.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.