During the 34th International Conference on Pharamcoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management, taking place from August 22 to 26 in Prague, Czech Republic, researchers will present findings that contrast the cost savings made possible by biosimilars in the US and European contexts.
During the 34th International Conference on Pharamcoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management, taking place from August 22 to 26 in Prague, Czech Republic, researchers will present findings that contrast the use and cost savings made possible by biosimilars in the US and European contexts.
Medicare Patients Pay More Out of Pocket for Biosimilar Filgrastim
US researchers assessed how out-of-pocket spending for Medicare Part D enrollees will be impacted by availability of biosimilars.1 Using Medicare formulary files from CMS for the third quarter of 2016, the investigators analyzed 879 stand-alone and 1920 Medicare Advantage drug formularies, summarizing drug prices at the point of sale and estimating out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries using filgrastim products.
They found that 96.2% of plans covered the reference filgrastim, Neupogen, and 57.2% covered the biosimilar, Zarxio. Out-of-pocket annual spending was higher for the biosimilar ($7105) than it was for the reference ($5538) by $1567.
“Generic competition and biosimilar entry in the specialty drug context may be less effective at reducing drug prices and patient out‐of‐pocket spending in the United States than anticipated,” concluded the authors.
Baseline Characteristics Play a Role in Which US Patients Receive Biosimilars
Furthermore, for US patients, baseline characteristics appear to play a role in which populations receive reference filgrastim versus the biosimilar Zarxio or follow-on tbo-filgrastim.2
Click to read more about tbo-filgrastim.
US researchers examined patient characteristics—and reported adverse events (AEs)—for new filgrastim users between 2015 and 2016. Using MarketScan data, they identified 5470 patients, 4155 of whom used the reference, 771 of whom used the follow-on, and 544 of whom used the biosimilar. More than 4% of reference use was among pediatric patients (versus less than 1% for the follow-on or biosimilar), while use among elderly patients was comparable among the 3 groups.
Patients who received the reference were more likely to be male and more likely to be diagnosed with leukemia than with other cancer types versus those who received the biosimilar or follow-on. Differences in use may be due, the authors write, to cancer type or age, provider preference, and reimbursement policies. Slight differences in AEs observed across the groups were likely to be a result of these differences in prescribing patterns, they added.
Biosimilars Reduce Economic Burden in Chronic Kidney Disease in Italy
Meanwhile, Italian researchers conducted a multi-regional, population-based study of the cost of treating patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA).3 ESAs represent between 6% and 17% of total treatment costs for patients with CKD in Italy, the investigators note.
In a total population of approximately 8 million, 7810 incident ESA users were identified between the years 2009 and 2014. The yearly mean cost of ESA treatment for each patient ranged from €1551 (approximately $1794) for those with stage I to stage III disease, to €2045 (approximately $2365) for patients receiving dialysis. Assuming 50% biosimilar uptake, the annual mean cost‐savings would total between €65,730 (approximately $76,013) for patients with stage I to stage III disease to €118,769 (approximately $137,350) for patients receiving dialysis.
“ESAs have a relevant economic burden in CKD and biosimilars guarantee 25‐30% saving of ESA purchase costs in CKD patients,” concluded the authors.
References
1. Dusetzina SB, Jazowski SA, Cole AL, Nguyen J. Coverage and out-of-pocket spending on brand versus generic/biosimilar specialty drugs in Medicare Part D. Presented at the 34th International Conference on Pharamcoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management, August 22-26, 2018; Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract 679. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pds.4629.
2. Brady BL, Irwin DE. Adverse events with recombinant G-CSF for neutropenia in cancer. Presented at the 34th International Conference on Pharamcoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management, August 22-26, 2018; Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract 1030. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pds.4629.
3. Ingrasciotta Y, Formica D, Giorgianni F, et al. Evaluation of health direct costs associated with the use of biosimilar and originator erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs): an Italian, multi-regional, population-based study. Presented at the 34th International Conference on Pharamcoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management, August 22-26, 2018; Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract 1036. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pds.4629.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Rising Biosimilar Adoption for an Italian Payer Will Benefit National Health Care System, Patients
April 9th 2024Data from 2021 and 2022 indicates increasing biosimilar use in an Italian health care company, with potential for full adoption in the future, benefiting both the National Health System and citizens through efficient and sustainable health care policies.
Review Highlights Most Popular European Policies to Boost Biosimilar Uptake
April 3rd 2024Although tender systems are a common strategy to encourage biosimilar utilization across Europe, policies like automatic substitution are rarely utilized, according to a systematic review of European policies and biosimilar uptake.