Rituximab has been successfully used “off label” to treat diseases driven by B-cell dysregulation, but concerns remain about the safety of using rituximab or similar agents for long periods.
B cells play a key role in many autoimmune diseases, including the immune-mediated neurological disorders neuromyelitis optica (NMO), multiple sclerosis (MS), and myasthenia gravis (MG). Rituximab, which causes short-term depletion of circulating naïve and memory B cells through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, complement mediated cytotoxicity, and induction of apoptosis, has been successfully used “off label” to treat diseases driven by B-cell dysregulation. The promising results of some studies on the use of rituximab in these disorders has generated interest in further developing B-cell depleting or anti-proliferative agents for use in these indications, but concerns remain about the safety of using rituximab or similar agents for long periods.
A study newly published in PLOS One sought to investigate the long-term safety, incidence of infections, and malignancies in patients receiving continuous therapy with rituximab over periods of 36 months to 7 years. The retrospective study was conducted at 2 tertiary centers in Detroit, Michigan, and Chicago, Illinois, and involved 29 patients with diagnoses of MS (n = 5), NMO (n = 21), or MG (n = 3) who received rituximab at doses of 1000 mg via intravenous administration every 6 to 9 months after an initial course of the drug. The mean duration of treatment was 51.3 months (±12.2 months), and the mean number of rituximab treatment cycles was 8.83 (±2.85).
During the observation period:
The study’s authors concluded that rituximab was well tolerated over time in patients with NMO, MS, and MG; that AEs and SAEs remained low throughout the observation period; and that patients remained clinically stable while receiving continuous rituximab infusions. Though the study was small, it makes an important contribution, say the authors, to documenting the long-term tolerability and efficacy of rituximab as a viable option for the treatment of immune-mediated neurological diseases. Further studies will be needed to corroborate these results.
What Clinicians Need to Know About Using Biosimilars to Treat IBD
April 13th 2024A review article, intended to act as a guide for clinicians, summarizes the available infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as others that are coming down the pipeline.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Study: More Biosimilar Competition Is Not Lowering Patient OOP Costs
March 29th 2024Despite more biosimilars entering the market and generating significant savings for payers and health care systems, these savings are not resulting in lower out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for patients, according to a recent study.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.