In terms of the interactions with patient organizations, the code specifies that companies should not only respect the autonomy of patient organizations and their independence, but also ensure that support for patient advocacy organizations in the form of grants or charitable contributions not be conditional on promoting a specific medicine.
This week, the Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) released a new code of business ethics for its member companies. The new code will take effect on September 1, 2018.
“The AAM Code of Business Ethics stands out from other pharmaceutical industry codes because of AAM’s clear recognition of the ethical value of access to medicines for patients. Our new code also priorities market competition as a driving force,” said AAM president and CEO Chip Davis in a statement.
The code incorporates the following goals and criteria for its members:
In terms of the interactions with patient organizations, the code goes on to specify that companies should not only respect the autonomy of patient organizations, but also ensure that support for patient advocacy organizations in the form of grants or charitable contributions not be conditional on promoting a specific medicine.
The announcement of AAM’s new code comes on the heels of the recent launch of the new database, “Pre$cription for Power,” developed by Kaiser Health News (KHN). The database evaluated the 20 pharmaceutical companies, and logged 12,000 donations from the companies to patient advocacy groups in 2015. The data show that the pharmaceutical companies contributed at least $116 million to patient groups in 2015 alone. These data have caused some concern among stakeholders, who feel that the financial ties are troubling if they have caused a patient group to act in a way that does not represent the interest of its members.
AAM’s new code of business ethics addresses some of these concerns in regulations for its own members.
“We must never take the ethics of healthcare access for granted. Our companies believe in our ethical mission, and AAM’s Board of Directors has approved this code. AAM looks forward to working with all stakeholders to expand access to generic and biosimilar medicines—the proven, reliable way to drive down the cost of medicine, which helps patients, strengthens our economy, and benefits our society,” says the organization.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.