Recently, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) released a set of policy recommendations to improve patient access to much-needed insulin and to lower the substantial cost to treat diabetes.
Recently, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) released a set of policy recommendations to improve patient access to much-needed insulin and to lower the substantial cost to treat diabetes.
Among the ADA’s recommendations are the following:
Competition and follow-on insulins: In the United States, follow-on insulins are currently regulated as drugs and not as biosimilars (though the ADA’s materials refer to such products as “biosimilars”). Currently, the FDA has approved 3 follow-on insulins: Admelog, Basaglar, and Lusduna, of which only Admelog and Basaglar are currently available for purchase in the United States.
Recently, the FDA published a list of medications that have lapsed in patent protection and do not have follow-on alternatives. Included in the list is insulin lispro (Humalog). The ADA encourages the FDA to continue its efforts to spur competition within the insulin landscape, including increasing competition from follow-ons.
Insulin supply chain transparency: The ADA’s working group concluded after discussions with stakeholders that there is an innate lack of transparency throughout the insulin supply chain. Without clear information about insulin pricing and costs to patients, it is difficult to properly identify solutions. Given this fact, the ADA recommends increasing transparency throughout the full supply chain, from manufacturers, wholesalers, pharmacy benefit managers, health plans, and pharmacies.
Health plan design and patient cost-sharing: The ADA recommends that insulins should not be subject to a deductible or coinsurance, because these practices expose patients to high list prices and create barriers to access to medication. The ADA notes that many plans are moving toward a value-based insurance design, and providing diabetes medications with low or no cost-sharing has previously been shown to increase medication adherence and better long-term health outcomes.
Additionally, the ADA recommends that health plans and government programs be required to limit out-of-pocket spending. Specifically, in the Medicare Part D program, the ADA recommends an annual out-of-pocket limit that is equal to the catastrophic phase trigger in order to provide a financial safety net for patients with high drug costs.
Continuity of care: Due to formulary decisions directly impacting insured patients, the ADA recommends that all health plans and government healthcare programs be prohibited from removing medications from their formularies or moving drugs to a higher tier during the plan year (with the exception of cases in which the FDA calls into question the safety of the drug).
“The ADA recommends policymakers take any steps necessary to ensure all people with diabetes have affordable access to insulin, regardless of where they live, whether they have insurance and how much money they earn,” read the policy statement.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.