US voters will head to the polls next week in the midterm elections, and in the run-up to the election, the Kaiser Family Foundation has revealed that pharmaceutical companies have donated nearly $79 million to members of Congress over the past 6 election cycles.
US voters will head to the polls next week in the midterm elections, and in the run-up to the election, the Kaiser Family Foundation has revealed that pharmaceutical companies have, over the past 6 election cycles, donated nearly $79 million to members of Congress.
These findings come from Kaiser’s newly launched “Pharma Cash to Congress” tool, which uses campaign finance reports from the Federal Election Commission. The interactive tool allows users to explore which lawmakers have received the biggest contributions from pharma, and which companies have given the most. Voters can search for members of congress to find detailed breakdowns of contributions received from individual pharmaceutical companies both in the current election cycle and since 2007.
According to Kaiser, since the beginning of 2017, 34 lawmakers have each received more than $100,000 each from drug makers’ political action committees (PACs), and 2 representatives—Kevin McCarthy, R-California, and Greg Walden, R-Oregon, have accepted more than $200,000 each.
More Republicans (209) than Democrats (185) received contributions, with Republican representatives and senators receiving a total of $4.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and Democratic representatives and senators receiving $3.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2018. During the 2010 election cycle, when Democrats were in power, a greater amount of donated dollars went to Democratic lawmakers.
Among companies who contributed the most were Pfizer ($1.02 million), Amgen ($946,000), AbbVie ($852,000), and Abbot Laboratories ($703,000).
Kaiser also notes that donations to lawmakers in election cycles tell only part of the story of pharma’s influence in US politics; its “Pre$cription for Power” tool, released in April of this year, tracked donations to patient advocacy groups that, it says, “provide patients to testify on Capitol Hill and organize social media campaigns on drugmakers’ behalf.”
Kaiser’s research into these donatiosn revealed that pharmaceutical companies gave $116 million to patient groups in 2015 alone, raising concerns that patient groups’ advocacy, and eventually the nation’s health policy, could be negatively impacted by pharma’s dollars.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.
British Columbia’s Biosimilar Policy Shows No Impact on Hospital Visits
May 28th 2025Despite a dramatic shift toward biosimilar use following British Columbia’s policy, researchers found no rise in hospital visits or complications, underscoring the real-world reliability of etanercept biosimilars in managing inflammatory arthritis.