AbbVie has announced that the FDA has accepted for priority review its New Drug Application for upadacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Upadacitinib is a proposed once-daily, small-molecule, oral Janus kinase inhibitor that, if approved, could be an alternative to therapy with such injectable biologics as AbbVie’s flagship RA treatment, adalimumab (Humira), which will face biosimilar competition in the United States by 2023.
AbbVie has announced that the FDA has accepted for priority review its New Drug Application (NDA) for upadacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Upadacitinib is a proposed once-daily, small-molecule, oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that, if approved, could be an alternative to therapy with such injectable biologics as AbbVie’s flagship RA treatment, adalimumab (Humira), which will face biosimilar competition in the United States by 2023.
AbbVie has long reassured investors that upadacitinib will help the company continue to lead in the immunology market after biosimilars of adalimumab reach the United States. In a 2018 presentation, Richard Gonzalez, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of AbbVie, said that upadacitinib—which AbbVie expects to launch in 6 indications by 2022, beginning with RA in 2019—will help the company’s immunology leadership to “…evolve from a single product to a portfolio of therapies.”
The NDA for the drug is supported by data from 5 of the 6 phase 3 SELECT trials in RA, which cumulatively enrolled more than 4900 patients with moderate to severe RA.
In October 2018, results of the phase 3 SELECT-COMPARE trial, presented during the American College of Rheumatology’s 2018 annual meeting, showed that upadacitinib outperformed both placebo and adalimumab in treating RA.1 The study met its primary end points of noninferiority and superiority of upadacitinib versus adalimumab at week 12 and radiographic inhibition for upadacitinib versus placebo at week 26. In the trial, the proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs) was higher for those given upadacitinib than those given placebo, but similar to those given adalimumab.
However, a patient death in the phase 3 SELECT-MONOTHERAPY trial dampened some enthusiasm about the product; while the study met all of its primary and key secondary end points, 1 patient taking a 15-mg dose of the study drug had a fatal hemorrhagic stroke caused by a ruptured aneurysm. There was also 1 event of pulmonary embolism in the study, also in a patient taking a 15-mg dose.
JAK inhibitors have, as a class, come under some scrutiny for their potential for AEs; in April 2018, the FDA’s Arthritis Advisory Committee voted to recommend a low dose of Eli Lilly’s JAK inhibitor, baricitinib, but voted against recommending approval of a higher dose given concerns about the potential for dose-dependent AEs such as thrombosis.
AbbVie says that it anticipates an FDA decision on upadacitinib in the third quarter of 2019.
Reference
1. Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Mysler E, et al. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study comparing upadacitinib to placebo and to adalimumab, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate. Presented at: American College of Rheumatology 2018 Meeting; October 19-24, 2018; Chicago, Illinois. Abstract 890. acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-study-comparing-upadacitinib-to-placebo-and-to-adalimumab-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-with-inadequate-response-to-methotrexate/.
Similar Persistence Rates Between Adalimumab New Starts, Switched Patients
December 7th 2024A French real-world study found that the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 was effective in treating rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, showing no loss of disease control in switched patients and similar persistence rates between naive and switched groups.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Cost and Efficacy Insights on Infliximab Biosimilars in Pediatric Uveitis
December 3rd 2024The study highlights the safety, efficacy, and cost benefits of infliximab biosimilars in managing pediatric noninfectious uveitis, showing fewer disease flares and reduced costs compared with reference infliximab, as well as the influence of insurance mandates on treatment decisions.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Denosumab Biosimilars Earn Positive CHMP Opinion for Bone Loss and Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
November 26th 2024The European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion for the denosumab biosimilars SB16 for all indications referencing Prolia and Xgeva.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.