Alexandra Valenti, JD, associate at Goodwin, discusses the future of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) in light of challenges to the Affordable Care Act.
Transcript
So, the [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, BPCIA] was enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act, and there was a recent successful challenge on constitutional grounds to the Affordable Care Act before a District Court in Texas. That decision is up on appeal now before the Fifth Circuit, and the Department of Justice has submitted a brief saying not only should the Fifth Circuit affirm that decision, but it should further find that provisions of the Affordable Care Act other than the individual mandate provision, which is the subject of the constitutional challenge, should be found to be not severable from the rest of the statute, meaning that if one provision of the statute goes down, so too the rest of the statute.
So, the question of whether the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act has any effect on the BPCIA will hinge on that question of severability and whatever court makes the ultimate decision on this question, whether that be the Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court in this case, finds that the individual mandate is severable from the rest of the statute. Of course, this doesn’t matter if the courts ultimately decide that the individual mandate provision is constitutional.
Interestingly, in the original challenge to the Affordable Care Act back in 2012, that was [National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius], before the Supreme Court, President Obama’s Department of Justice submitted a brief that argued that the rest of the statute should not be found to be severable from the individual mandate because Congress would not have enacted the entire statute without the Individual Mandate Provision. So, it’s interesting to see the Obama administration and the Trump administration taking essentially the same position on the same issue.
Eye on Pharma: Canadian Aflibercept Settlement; Sandoz Acquires Cimerli; Payer Chooses Cyltezo
March 6th 2024Biocon Biologics settled with the maker of Eylea (aflibercept), announcing a launch date for its biosimilar competitor in Canada; Sandoz has officially acquired Cimerli, a ranibizumab biosimilar; AARP Medicare Rx from United Healthcare has added Cyltezo (adalimumab-adbm) and removed the originator (Humira) from its formulary.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Patient With MS Sues J&J Over ERISA Violation
February 14th 2024After a patient with multiple sclerosis (MS) was forced to pay exorbitant out-of-pocket costs for a brand name medication when she could’ve gotten a generic for way less, the patient filed a class action complaint against her employer, Johnson & Johnson (J&J), for violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Q&A With Dr Chelsee Jensen: Navigating FDA Approvals, Challenges in the Biosimilar Landscape
January 14th 2024Chelsee Jensen, PharmD, BCPS, senior pharmacy specialist and pharmaceutical formulary manager at Mayo Clinic, reacts to the biggest FDA approvals of 2023 and how she sees the adalimumab, natalizumab, and tocilizumab spaces playing out.
Eye on Pharma: Fresh Biosimilar Lawsuits; FDA to Review Ustekinumab, Denosumab Biosimilars
January 11th 2024As Regeneron gears up for a legal battle with biosimilar competitors for its reference aflibercept, CareFirst files a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson for restricting biosimilar ustekinumab competition; Celltrion and Accord BioPharma file with the FDA to approve their respective biosimilar candidates.