Ali McBride, PharmD, MS, BCPS, clinical coordinator of hematology/oncology at the University of Arizona Cancer Center, discusses experience with biosimilar pegfilgrastim so far.
Transcript
So we’ve already seen 2 biosimilars come to market. We have Udenyca and Fulphila, both drugs are FDA approved for the current indication for pegfilgrastim this setting. So we've seen the actual market start to develop. A lot of discussion has been utilized. We’ve seen some quick implementation for Fulphila and also Udenyca; many sites across the country are transitioning towards that, but also what’s going to actually be distinguished in this discussion is we’re also seeing payers put those biosimilars as a first-line suggestion for therapies in terms of not using the brand-name product.
As you move forward with these pieces, which payers will define what type of biosimilar they use or what maybe their step edits will be for treatment, then it will actually be up to the site or institution to put them in stock.
So if we actually see the emergence of 4, 5, 6 biosimilar pegfilgrastims in the market shortly, the problem will be, will each payer define what type of biosimilar they’ll use? That's going to be very tough for us or any institution any of our [Association of Community Cancer Center, ACCC] members out there, any of our cancer centers. They'll have to stock each one and figure out what type of biosimilar to use per patient.
What makes it worse, or even more confounding, is the amount of time that needs to be noted for that. For the technician, the buyer in this case, but also if you have maybe 5 different companies making biosimilars, and then you have 10 biosimilar lines—a rituximab, and Avastin, a Herceptin, you may have your short-acting growth factor and long-acting growth factor—you start to name these therapies as they evolve, if payers don't actually have a more concise attitude or discussion point for these biosimilars, it will make it very tough to address what pegfilgrastim you have, or if you need to carry many other pieces of that as well.
Q&A With Dr Chelsee Jensen: Navigating FDA Approvals, Challenges in the Biosimilar Landscape
January 14th 2024Chelsee Jensen, PharmD, BCPS, senior pharmacy specialist and pharmaceutical formulary manager at Mayo Clinic, reacts to the biggest FDA approvals of 2023 and how she sees the adalimumab, natalizumab, and tocilizumab spaces playing out.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
IGBA 2023: Dr Monique Mansoura Highlights the Intersection of Geopolitical Issues, Biopharma
February 19th 2023COVID-19 allowed governments to critically examine the biopharma space to increase access to vaccines, but there's still a way to go, according to Monique Mansoura, PhD, MBA, executive director of global health security and biotechnology at the MITRE Corporation, at the International Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association’s annual meeting.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.