Therapeutic drug monitoring is of particular importance in optimizing treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are receiving therapy with anti–tumor necrosis (anti-TNF) drugs like adalimumab. This week, during the United European Gastroenterology (UEG) Week 2019 meeting, held in Barcelona, Spain, researchers will present new findings on monitoring serum trough levels of Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar adalimumab, Imraldi, in patients with IBD.
Therapeutic drug monitoring is of particular importance in optimizing treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are receiving therapy with anti—tumor necrosis (anti-TNF) drugs like adalimumab. This week, during the United European Gastroenterology Week 2019 meeting, held in Barcelona, Spain, researchers will present new findings on monitoring serum trough levels of Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar adalimumab, Imraldi, in patients with IBD.
First, a research team from the Czech Republic will present data from a study in 87 patients with IBD, 77 of whom had Crohn disease (CD) and 10 of whom had ulcerative colitis (UC) who were switched from the reference adalimumab, Humira, to the biosimilar.1 These patients all had 3 previous measurements of adalimumab trough levels from their treatment with the originator drug, and their biosimilar adalimumab trough levels were measured at week 10 after the switch using an adalimumab-validated ELISA assay.
The researchers report that there was “excellent” quantitative agreement between adalimumab trough levels before and after the switch to the biosimilar (Spearman’s rank coefficient values, R = .756, P <.0001).
Moreover, there were no differences in C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin values before and after the switch, and no significant differences in disease activity scores using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index or partial Mayo score.
Another research team, also from the Czech Republic, will report on the use of 2 different monitoring assays—a TNF-based ELISA kit and a monoclonal antibody-based ELISA kit—for monitoring trough levels of the biosimilar.2
The research team obtained 62 samples of sera from patients (54 of whom had CD and 8 of whom had UC) who were receiving maintenance therapy with Imraldi at a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks. Adalimumab trough levels were measured by both the standard TNF-based assay and by the monoclonal antibody assay, and the data were analyzed, with a Kruskal-H test used to compare the 2 cohorts of concentration values.
The researchers report that quantitative agreement was observed between the 2 measurement kits (R = .804, P <.0001), and the non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test showed that the median tough level concentrations did not differ (P =.363), and they add that these data should be valuable in determining the potential to use the kits as tools for drug monitoring during biosimilar adalimumab treatment.
These new data, said Ian Henshaw, vice president and head of the global biosimilars unit at Biogen, which together with Samsung BioLogics comprises Samsung Bioepis, are part of continued research “with the goal of generating data that will enable us to deliver value to patients with high unmet needs.”
References
1. Lukas M, Pesinová V, Bortlik M, et al. Impact of the switch from original adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab SB5 on serum drug trough levels, clinical and biological disease activity in patients with IBD. Presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week 2019; October 29-23, 2019; Barcelona, Spain.
2. Malícková K, Bortlík M, Duricová D, et al. Serum trough SB5 levels: A comparison of two different immunoassays for the monitoring of biosimilar adalimumab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week 2019; October 29-23, 2019; Barcelona, Spain.
Patient Perceptions of Switching From the Reference Adalimumab to Amjevita During Its Initial Launch
April 20th 2024In a survey of patients with autoimmune arthritis who had been switched from reference adalimumab (Humira) to biosimilar adalimumab-atto (Amjevita; Amgen), most reported preferring the biosimilar and had no concerns about switching.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for January 2024—Podcast Edition
February 4th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we reminisce on all the major gastroenterology news from January, which brought several reports quantifying how the gastroenterology biosimilar market is progressing and marked the 1-year anniversary of adalimumab biosimilar competition in the US.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.